Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch addresses the Utah Republican Party's annual organizing convention Saturday, May 18, 2013, in Sandy, Utah. Hatch says staffers at the Internal Revenue Service, which recently apologized for unfairly targeting tea party groups, "are either deliberately incompetent or they are evil." Hatch mentioned the IRS scandal while addressing thousands of fellow Republicans in Sandy on Saturday for the state party's annual organizing convention. Hatch says the IRS scandal is more concerning than almost anything else he's seen in the 36 years he's been in the U.S. Senate. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)

WASHINGTON (AP) - Foreigners leaving the country through any of the nation's 30 busiest airports would undergo mandatory fingerprinting under an amendment senators added Monday to a sweeping immigration bill.

Lawmakers called it a step toward a more expansive biometric system that would use identifiers such as fingerprints to keep track of immigrants and visitors exiting the U.S. Currently no such system is in place, something viewed as a security weakness, particularly because some 40 percent of the 11 million immigrants in the country illegally overstayed their visas and there's no good system for tracking them.

"This is an agreement that we need to build toward a biometric visa exit system," said Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., who offered the amendment by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who was absent Monday. "Implementing this biometric exit system is long overdue."

A full-fledged biometric entry-exit system is favored by many senators but was deemed too expensive and unworkable to include in the bill. Current law already requires such a system to be in place, but the Department of Homeland Security has not implemented it. Instead the bill seeks electronic scanning of photo IDs.

Under Hatch's amendment, the nation's 10 busiest airports would have to establish a fingerprinting system within two years after enactment of the immigration bill. Within six years it would have to be in place at the 30 busiest airports.

The amendment passed 13 to 5.

"The entire system, as current law requires, should be implemented," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., who voted no. "It's a retreat from current law, a weakening of current law."

The committee last week rejected an amendment by Sessions to fully implement a biometric screening system. After Sessions' amendment failed, one of the authors of the immigration bill, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., announced publicly that he regretted the failure of Sessions' amendment and would continue pushing for a biometric system to be put in place. The passage of Hatch's amendment Monday allows authors of the legislation to argue that they're working to boost security provisions in the bill as Rubio and others have said is necessary to ensure its passage.

The vote happened as the Senate Judiciary Committee plunged Monday into its third week of deliberations on the immigration legislation, which aims to secure the borders, improve workplace enforcement and legal immigration, and offer eventual citizenship to millions of people here illegally. The committee is wading through around 300 amendments as it aims for a final vote on the bill by Wednesday night. Democrats have enough votes on the committee to ensure its passage, which would send it to the Senate floor.

Also Monday the committee approved adding more visas for Tibetans, increasing information sharing among federal agencies when people overstay their visas, and tightening up the nation's asylum and refugee system so that people would lose their asylum or refugee status if they returned home to the country they fled, unless they can show a good reason for doing so.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said the asylum change was merited in light of the Boston Marathon bombings. The brothers who allegedly set off the bombs arrived in the U.S. as boys when their family sought asylum here.

An attempt by Sessions to block immigrants who gain legal status under the bill from getting the earned income tax credit was defeated on a party-line vote.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

122 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    SurpriseMe wrote...
    encourage human smuggling
    to citizenship for illegal immigrants. that only encourages people to cross our borders the wrong way. in fact one could say it encourages human smuggling. What about the Legal Immigrant? every immigrant needs to become legal first and earn their citizenship. We have path to citizenship today, in fact thousands every year do it legally.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    1986 was the overhaul of all overhauls
    and our government ignored it right after it's passing. The worst violator since has been Obama who has flat out ignored the laws and Constitution.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    If you think Obamacare is bad now
    Just wait till millions more are added if amnesty is passed.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    The
    politicians created the problem wih poor enforcement of existing immigration laws....now they want to be heroes fixing something that they caused.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    We do not need reform
    We need enforcement.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Republicans see the writing on the wall.
    Demonstrate a commitment to fixing deficiencies in the immigration system, or face extinction.,
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    "Now, with some Republicans chastened
    by the November elections which demonstrated the importance of Latino voters and their increasing commitment to Democrats, some in the GOP say this time will be different." Or in other words, this is about harvesting votes, not necessarily what's best for the Country, but what's best for political careers.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    back assward and corrupt
    So we are now rewarding lawbreakers and penalizing the successful. The inmates really are running the insane asylum in DC.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Votes over Principles
    The GOP takes a page from the Democrats.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Ma wants to live in one of the communist
    countries where an individual's self interest is discouraged. Here in the U.S., Ma, self interest is what drives our economic engines. Throughout our history, it has been the labor and other social inputs of successive waves of immigrants that has lifted all boats. Still the case.