Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, to introduce legislation on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition feeding devices. Congressional Democrats are reintroducing legislation to ban assault weapons but the measure faces long odds even after last month's mass school shooting in Newtown, Conn. The measure being unveiled Thursday is authored by Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, who wrote the original assault weapons ban. That law expired in 2004 when Congress refused to renew it under pressure from the National Rifle Association. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

WASHINGTON (AP) - Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who's leading the push to restore an assault weapon ban, acknowledged on Sunday that the effort faces tough odds to pass Congress and she blamed the nation's largest gun-rights group.

Feinstein, D-Calif., on Thursday introduced a bill that would prohibit 157 specific weapons and ammunition magazines that have more than 10 rounds. The White House and fellow Democrats are skeptical the measure is going anywhere, given lawmakers who are looking toward re-election might fear pro-gun voters and the National Rifle Association.

"This has always been an uphill fight. This has never been easy. This is the hardest of the hard," Feinstein said.

"I think I can get it passed because the American people are very much for it," Feinstein said of the measure that follows a similar measure she championed into law 1994 but expired a decade later.

She acknowledged, however, the NRA's political clout.

"They come after you. They put together large amounts of money to defeat you," Feinstein said.

She also said the group was a pawn of those who make weapons.

"The NRA is venal. ... The NRA has become an institution of gun manufacturers," she said.

The NRA disputed her characterization.

"The NRA is a grass-roots organization. We have more than 4 million dues-paying members and tens of millions of supporters all across this country. Our political power comes from them. Decent and logical people would understand that," spokesman Andrew Arulanandam said.

The Senate Judiciary Committee plans to take up the proposal on Wednesday and hear from the NRA's CEO and senior vice president, Wayne LaPierre. Mark Kelly, the husband of former Rep. Gabby Giffords, D-Ariz., who was shot in an assassination attempt, also plans to testify.

Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the GOP vice presidential nominee in 2012, said Congress should focus on the causes of violence and not the weapons alone.

"We need to look beyond just recycling failed policies of the past. ... Let's go beyond just this debate and make sure we get deeper. What's our policy on mental illness? What's going on in our culture that produces this kind of thing? You know, we need to have that kind of a discussion and debate," Ryan said.

Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., also urged lawmakers to consider mental health issues.

"When I hear some of this conversation, I think that we're looking at symptoms, we're not looking at the root causes," she said. "And I understand the senator's passion for this, but I got to tell you, an assault ban is not the answer to helping keep people safe."

New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, who favors the assault weapons ban, expressed skepticism that it would be returned to law.

"It's probably a heavy lift in Congress," he said.

In the wake of the elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn. In December, President Barack Obama has pushed to expanded background checks, restoring the assault weapons ban and banning high-capacity ammunition magazines. But members of his own party may thwart his hopes.

Feinstein appeared on CBS' "Face the Nation" and CNN's "State of the Union." Ryan was on NBC's "Meet the Press." Blackburn and Kelly were on CBS.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

share this story:
facebook

31 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Hey all you Fascist pigs on the left
    Just keep in mind what happened to you imbeciles in 1994. :)
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    There are still a few Dems with
    Constitutional values and hopefully they will not cave to political pressure.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Steve they won't cave
    Because they know they're history if they do.Besides it will never make it through the house.And the states will ignore Oliars illegal executive order.This is just another pipe dream of the fascist pig in the white house.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    It would be nice to see common sense
    play apart of this. Quit with the radical agenda of gun control, stop and think about what you are doing, stop and think about the agendas being proposed have been proven to fail time and time again. Use your heads, protect the Consitution don't fight it. It sickens me to see people who are hell bent on destroying this Nation all because they have a feeling about something.
  • Abuse
    2cents wrote...
    Who cares whether Congress objects?
    When did that ever stop Obama? Congress has been an archived branch of government since 2008. It is just Obamas stage prop, to convince people that it still has any power. Obama is well aware that the legislation will not pass, and has already made it known that he will impose yet another batch of restrictions with a stroke of his pen. It is not, as he sells it, about security. It is about riding the waves . . . currently, the anti-gun wave . . . to usher in that checkmate move that he has been working toward.
  • Abuse
    Picasso wrote...
    If you truly want to reduce crime...
    ...and episodes of crazy man shootings,society as a whole needs to care more about people and less about the rights of criminals and crazies. Which means removing obstacles to 2 violent strikes laws and involuntary institutionalization of those in need. Also people need to remember that the NRA is an organization made up of people who pay money for their voice to be heard regarding 2nd amendment rights, and not just a self-funded lobby with influence on the hill.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    The NRA is the gun manufacturers lobby.
    "Throughout its history, the National Rifle Association has portrayed itself as an advocate for individual gun owners’ Second Amendment rights. But a new investigation finds the group has come to rely on the support of the $12-billion-a-year gun industry — made up of firearms and ammunition manufacturers and sellers. Since 2005, the NRA has collected as much as $38.9 million from dozens of gun industry giants, including Beretta USA; Glock; and Sturm, Ruger & Co., according to a 2011 study by the Violence Policy Center. "
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    That was interesting info Micho
    Thanks for the tidbits. I enjoy an NRA membership along with millions of Americans.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The good ole VPC
    The overall goal of the VPC is to ban most types of firearms in the United States. Now that's Americana.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Gun control has been tried and
    and it has largely failed. The Progressive minds would prefer all guns be banned then even the criminals wouldn't have them, right? Lol. The Founding Fathers understood the importance of arming citizens as both a deterrent to crime and a deterrent to tyranny. Americans should be able to force out a political system that has turned monstrous. The Left understands this and they want to disarm citizens, figuring that that citizens will fight with homemade weapons or none at all. They hope to place us in the position of the slaves who simply were not capable of resisting.