Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
President Barack Obama, next to Vice President Joe Biden, gestures as he speaks during a news conference in the Rose Garden of the White House, in Washington, on Wednesday, April 17, 2013, about the defeat in the Senate of a bill to expand background checks on guns. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

WASHINGTON (AP) - Blocked by Congress from expanding gun sale background checks, President Barack Obama is turning to actions within his own power to keep people from buying a gun who are prohibited for mental health reasons.

Federal law bans certain mentally ill people from purchasing firearms, but not all states are providing data to stop the prohibited sales to the FBI's background check system. A federal review last year found 17 states contributed fewer than 10 mental health records to the database, meaning many deemed by a judge to be a danger still could have access to guns.

The Obama administration was starting a process Friday aimed at removing barriers in health privacy laws that prevent some states from reporting information to the background check system. The action comes two days after the Senate rejected a measure that would have required buyers of firearms online and at gun shows to pass a background check. That's already required for shoppers at licensed gun dealers.

Stung by the defeat, Obama vowed to keep up the fight for the background check expansion but also to do what he could through executive action.

"Even without Congress, my administration will keep doing everything it can to protect more of our communities," Obama said from the Rose Garden shortly after the Senate voted. "We're going to address the barriers that prevent states from participating in the existing background check system."

Obama also mentioned giving law enforcement more information about lost and stolen guns and establishing emergency plans for schools. Those measures were among the 23 executive actions the president signed in January when he announced his broader push for tighter gun laws in response to a mass shooting of first-graders and staff at Newtown, Conn.'s Sandy Hook Elementary School.

The Health and Human Services Department on Friday was beginning to ask for public comment on how the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, passed by Congress in 1996 and known as HIPAA, is preventing some states from reporting to the background check system and how to address the problem. Under HIPAA, health care providers such as hospitals may release limited information to police, but only in certain circumstances such as when a court is involved.

Since 1968, federal law has banned the sale of guns to those who have been deemed a danger to themselves or others, involuntarily committed or judged not guilty by reason of insanity or incompetent to stand trial. The background check system- which is also used to prevent convicted felons from buying guns- was established under the 1993 Brady Bill.

A few state agencies shared mental health records voluntarily for years, but the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007 spurred passage of legislation that required states to submit the records or eventually risk losing up to 5 percent of the federal funding they receive to fight crime.

Last year's review by the Government Accountability Office found that although the number of mental health records available to the background check system increased 800 percent since 2004, some states said they were not sharing mental health information because of concerns about restrictions under HIPAA privacy law. Obama is interested in a change that would specifically allow disclosure of mental health records for the system, and he wants to increase financial incentives for states to contribute the information.

In the Virginia Tech rampage, student Seung-Hui Cho shot 32 people to death and committed suicide. He was able to buy two guns even though he had been ruled a danger to himself during a court hearing in 2005 and was ordered to undergo outpatient mental health treatment.

Authorities have not described a possible motive or released details of any mental health condition that might explain why Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza killed 20 children and six adults before killing himself. The rifle he used was purchased by his mother, whom he also killed at home before heading to the school.

The background check system does not give retailers access to mental health records but simply tells them whether a buyer is approved, denied or needs additional investigation before a firearm may be purchased. The system doesn't tell the seller why a potential buyer was denied.

___

Follow Nedra Pickler on Twitter: https://twitter.com/nedrapickler


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

share this story:
facebook

116 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Sure, nokidding, and thanks for the courtesy.
    I know that you prefer to talk about drug wars rather than the unpleasant subject at hand, small kiddies slaughtered by the dozens with multiple gunshots from a high powered assault style weapon with high capacity magazines, but come now. Gun nuts and the NRA prefer to have shoot outs in first grade classrooms over taking steps to prevent those in the first place. That point of view seems at odds with public safety.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Gun nut fantasy:
    A Wyatt Earp/OK Corrall type shoot out with the heavily armed, body armor wearing bad guy. Scores of rounds exchanged before the bad guy hits the dirt, our slightly bloodied hero standing tall. Problem with the fantasy, the shoot out happens in little Junior's first grade classroom. Tiny bodies immobile or writhing on the floor, victims of both bad guy and "friendly fire". Gun nuts can't be troubled to help think of some type of preventative measures as an alternative to this scenario, so alluring is this fantasy to them.
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    Does anyone find it creepy
    how much Micho refers to children in his rants? Could it be deep inner feelings showing through, emotional scars, or something far more disgusting?
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    And the oscar goes to Micho
    for fictional drama. Common sense plays no part here and neither does protecting the Constitution.
  • Abuse
    2cents wrote...
    Watching it unfold
    Until now, it has been a no-brainer for government to tighten public safety as needed. Courthouses and other public buildings were long ago secured, as could be schools for the same reason. Now, however, we have a regime that considers this to be the perfect opportunity to obliterate yet another Constitutional provision, right before our eyes . . . under the guise of public safety . . . blanketed with the emotional drama of a Broadway play. We stand by and let it be done, as have other fallen nations.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Gun nuts assure us that it is necessary
    for them to have as many high capacity magazines as they can hoard in order to topple the duly elected Federal Government which has fallen into gun nut disfavor. Gun nuts imagine that they will lead a popular, but illegal, treasonous and Constitution violating insurrection, best the defending U.S. military and their local law enforcement agencies, and save the day for the rest of us. Gun nuts will then, they imagine, install a gun nut oligarchy of their own to rule in place of the government set up by our Founding Fathers. I wish I was making this up.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    @ Micho
    Oh but you are making this up and that's the irony of it all. You think the stuff you post is factual, but it amounts to nothing more than imaginary fluff.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The Left continues to believe
    that more laws will curtail gun violence all the while cities like Chicago, DC and States like NY and CT where gun laws are very strict do nothing to stop gun violence. Chicago thugs don't stop, the gunman in CT didn't stop because it was a gun free school zone, the aurora shooter didn't stop because of the sign on the door said no guns allowed, the VT campus shooter didn't stop because guns are not permitted on campus, the Columbine kids didn't stop because of the Assault Weapons ban. The sheer stupidity of people is amazing.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Micho and high capacity magazines
    Anti-gun kooks in their infinite wisdom, seem to think the answer is "less than ten." It's simply not ok to shoot people with 16 or 17 rounds, but it is ok if it's less than ten. They seem to think that weapons capable of delivering large numbers of rounds have no purpose being in the hands of Americans. What they fail to understand or are quick to ignore is that our Founders had very specific intentions in regard to firearms and the protection of the people's right to own them. And the intent had little, if anything, to do with hunting or sport.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Logic of the Left
    Guns are evil if it has a collapsable stock, thumb grip, pistol grip or more than 10 rounds. All of these inflict destructive carnage. I guess three 10 round magazines are ok, just not the one 30 or 20 round magazine. This is just some of the logic coming from the Left.