Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
President Barack Obama answers questions during his new conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, April 30, 2013. Obama's prospects for a sweeping legislative victory this year now rest almost solely on the immigration overhaul working its way through Congress. But immigration's tricky politics have created a dilemma for a president fighting for an issue he considers central to his legacy. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama's prospects for a sweeping legislative victory this year now rest almost solely on the immigration overhaul working its way through Congress. But immigration's tricky politics have created a dilemma for a president fighting for an issue he considers central to his legacy.

If Obama is too closely aligned with the legislation, it could scare away Republicans wary of appearing to hand the president a win. But if he stays on the sidelines and the overhaul runs into trouble on Capitol Hill, Obama likely will be criticized for not using his presidential powers to fight for votes, as he was following the recent failure of gun control measures he championed.

In the coming weeks the White House will test whether Obama can take on a more public role in the immigration debate after largely ceding the issue to Congress for much of the year. The president will ramp up his immigration-related travel this spring and summer, including a trip this week to Mexico and Costa Rica. The White House also is planning to use Spanish-language media to bolster public support for a comprehensive bill.

Still, Obama signaled during a White House news conference Tuesday that his primary talking point will be that he's backing a bill drafted by the Senate's so-called Gang of Eight, a group of four Democrats and four Republicans.

"I've been impressed by the work that was done by the Gang of Eight," Obama said. "The bill that they produced is not the bill that I would have written- there are elements of it that I would change- but I do think that it meets the basic criteria that I laid out from the start."

Immigration reform gained little traction in Congress during Obama's first term, in part because of opposition from GOP lawmakers. But the November election changed the political calculus for some Republicans, who watched Hispanic voters overwhelmingly side with Obama and Democrats as they increased their share of the national electorate.

At the request of the Gang of Eight, Obama kept a low-profile as the Senate working group set about the delicate task of crafting a draft bill earlier this year. The potential damage caused by White House involvement was underscored when a copy of Obama's own draft bill was leaked in February, raising suspicions among Republicans about his motivations and threatening to upend the effort.

But now that the Gang of Eight bill is public and is winning some Republican support, White House advisers say there's less risk in Obama taking on a larger public role in the debate too.

The focus on immigration in the capital comes as rallies are expected in dozens of cities around the country Wednesday in what has become an annual cry for easing the nation's immigration laws.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, a favorite of conservatives and potential GOP presidential candidate in 2016, is one if the bill's architects, as is Arizona's Republican Sen. John McCain. And even in the Republican-led House, where an immigration overhaul faces a steeper challenger, the Gang of Eight measure has won praise from House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis.

The bill would strengthen border security, allow tens of thousands of new high- and low-skilled workers into the country, require all employers to check their workers' legal status and provide an eventual path to citizenship for some 11 million immigrants now here illegally.

The measure is similar to the immigration principles Obama outlined in January during a visit to Las Vegas, his only immigration-focused trip of the year, though there are key differences. For example, the Senate bill makes the pathway to citizenship contingent on securing the border, which Obama opposes, and does not recognize gay couples, which Obama supports.

Many immigration advocates say they support Obama getting more involved in the debate as the draft bill weaves its way through the Senate Judiciary Committee, and likely to the Senate floor.

"He needs to be an advocate and push for the bill in the Senate to make sure this gets done," Eliseo Medina of the Service Employees International Union said of the president. "We need continued sustained pressure from all facets."

McCain also welcomed the prospect of a more proactive Obama, saying the president is committed to being heavily engaged. But the Arizona Republican, who has spoken with Obama about the immigration negotiations several times in recent weeks, added that the president "doesn't want to harm the passage of the bill either. And I believe him."

But some Republicans remain suspicious of the president's efforts and say he's trying to sink the bill in order to use the legislative failure for political gain.

"I think the president wants to campaign on immigration reform in 2014 and 2016," Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said in an interview with CBS News. "I think the reason the White House is insisting on a path to citizenship for those who are here illegally is because the White House knows that insisting on that is very likely to scuttle the bill."

Obama advisers insist he would rather be able to claim victory on the immigration overhaul that has eluded him than use a failure as leverage in the midterm elections- a proposition that has no guarantee of working in his favor.

___

Associated Press writer Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.

___

Follow Julie Pace on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jpaceDC


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

share this story:
facebook

35 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    The Chemist wrote...
    US Presidents have always used
    Executive Orders to push ahead their agenda. Or...you folks forgot that Lincoln suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus and issued the Emancipation Proclamation WITH OUT Congress approval?
  • Abuse
    Minuteman wrote...
    Now they have the names
    of the children..Finding and deporting their parents should be easy..Trading one for the other. Divided nation mr President..Why have an immigration policy when your just going to ignore it?
    Protect our borders and our communities
  • Abuse
    Japricka_Joe wrote...
    WEAK...
    Obama is WEAK........ I know that if we dug up George Washington & Abraham Lincoln, they would both be found on their stomachs. They may have rolled over several times in the last 4 years.
    J.Joey
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Flashback
    For years the administration had said it didn’t have the authority to make such a move, saying it couldn’t decide to stop deporting wide categories of people on its own without approval from Congress.
  • Abuse
    Larry in Glendale wrote...
    What a coincidence
    That this announcement comes just in time for campaign season.
  • Abuse
    icyou wrote...
    Obama
    you are so fired!!!!!
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Enjoyed the Heckler
    .
  • Abuse
    The Chemist wrote...
    @ Steve
    Sure you enjoyed the heckler. Imbeciles that that individual go in line with your level of education and civility. Again...how many times were you kicked out of school for being disruptive? How many times did you get your face kicked in on the playground for being a pest? Again?
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    A wise decision by the President.
    Obama knows very well that Republicans will block any effort at sensible immigration reform by claiming that they must see some unachievable "securing of the border" first. Any Republican who now says that this mini-Dream Act should wait to be part of a broader reform package is lying through their teeth. My bet is that Romney would have proposed something similar as part of his campaign package. Repubs are pizzed that Obama took away a possible lure for Hispanic votes.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Aren't any of you people ashamed
    This country was built and put together to make us a country with morals, strength and fiber beyond anything the world has seen before, yet, we continually take it apart, take apart certain segments of the populace and or take apart the opposing party. When Repbulicans were in charge...hate was shot at them...now that Democrats have a little more say with Obama as President...hate is shot at them and their policies.