Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, right, is hugged by Rep. Rhonda Fields, D-Aurora, after he signed gun control bills into law at the Capitol in Denver on Wednesday, March 20, 2013. Fields was a co-sponsor of bills on background checks and the size of ammunition magazines. (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski, Pool)

DENVER (AP) - Colorado's governor signed bills Wednesday that place new restrictions on firearms, signaling a change for Democrats who have traditionally shied away from gun control in a state with a pioneer tradition of gun ownership and self-reliance.

The legislation thrust Colorado into the national spotlight as a potential test of how far the country might be willing to go with new gun restrictions after the horror of mass killings at an Aurora movie theater and a Connecticut elementary school.

Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper signed bills that require background checks for private and online gun sales and ban ammunition magazines that hold more than 15 rounds.

The debate in the Democratic-controlled Legislature was intense, and Republicans warned that voters would make Democrats pay. The bills failed to garner a single Republican vote.

The bills' approval came exactly eight months after dozens of people were shot in Aurora, and a day after the executive director of the state Corrections Department, Tom Clements, was shot and killed at his home. Hickenlooper signed the legislation right after speaking with reporters about Clements' slaying.

Hickenlooper said large-capacity magazines "have the potential to turn killers into killing machines." He also said he realized some gun owners may be inconvenienced but that "the potential for damage seems to outweigh, significantly, the inconvenience that people would have," he said.

The bills signal a historic change for Democrats in a state where owning a gun is as common as owning a car in some rural areas.

"He just slapped rural Colorado right in the face," said Republican Sen. Brophy, who represents an eastern plains district. "They are overwhelmingly upset about this."

Both bills take effect July 1. People who currently own larger-capacity magazines will be able to keep them.

At the signing ceremony, Hickenlooper was surrounded by lawmakers who sponsored the bills, and relatives of mass shootings. Hickenlooper also signed requiring buyers to pay fees for background checks.

Each time he signed a bill, applause erupted from lawmakers and their guests, who included Jane Dougherty, whose sister was killed in the attack at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn.; Sandy Phillips, whose daughter was killed in Aurora; and Tom Mauser, whose son was killed in the 1999 Columbine shooting in Colorado.

Phillips, who lost daughter Jessica Ghawi, reminded Hickenlooper that it was the eight-month anniversary of the theater rampage.

"You've given us a real gift today," she told the governor.

Later, Phillips added: "Thank you so much. You're leading the entire country."

Dougherty thanked Hickenlooper with tears in her eyes. Mauser also expressed gratitude.

"I knew it would be a long haul," he said. "But I had faith in the people of Colorado."

Democratic Rep. Rhonda Fields, who represents the district that includes the Aurora theater, said the governor had signed "common-sense legislation."

"Gun violence is a problem nationwide, and sadly in the state of Colorado, we are all too familiar with some of these tragedies," Fields.

Lawmakers debated firearms proposals after the Columbine High School shooting, and began requiring background checks for buyers at gun shows. But nothing they did then was as sweeping as the proposals they took up this year.

This year, Colorado lawmakers succeeded while members of their party stumbled in other states.

Washington state's Democrat-controlled House failed this month to pass a universal background check bill. A bill requiring background checks at gun shows in New Mexico also stalled in that Democrat-led Legislature.

Republicans have warned that voters will punish Hickenlooper and other Democrats who voted in favor of the measures.

"The real solution here is at the ballot box in 2014," Brophy said.

Republicans have said limiting magazine sizes will drive jobs from the state, and ultimately won't prevent criminals from getting larger magazines in other states.

One Colorado-based manufacturer of ammunition magazines disclosed plans to relocate because of the new restrictions.

Police chiefs in urban areas supported the bills, but some rural county sheriffs opposed the new background checks, arguing the move is unenforceable and endangers Second Amendment rights.

Hickenlooper said law enforcement should try to find common ground.

"This shouldn't be rural versus urban. We are one state," he said.

___

Associated Press writer Kristen Wyatt contributed to this report.

___

Find Ivan Moreno on Twitter: http://twitter.com/IvanJourno


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

share this story:
facebook

17 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Brain dead liberals actually think
    that a criminal who obtains a gun illegally now, won't obtain one illegally if a universal background check law is passed. Brain dead liberals think cosmetics on a gun make it more deadly. Brain dead liberals think two ten round magazines or in this case a 15 round magazine will do less damage. Brain dead liberals think the gun not the person is the problem.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Good deal! Here's hoping the legislation
    continues its advance towards enactment. Just as no law stops all of the criminal acts that it is intended to address, some deterrent good will result from the steps being taken.
  • Abuse
    OneWonders wrote...
    I agree
    Micho, stricter laws for the criminal after they commit the crime and are found guilty. Oh wait, that's not what you are talking about though are you.
    Equal Justice, Not Social Justice.
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    Gun violence not only type
    It is interesting that everybody thinks guns are the source of all violence, and that the US is the most violent place in the world. A study done based on 2011 data compared Great Britain to the US on violence, and while gun related violence is much higher in the US (owing to the fact that guns are banned in Great Britain), there was more than 5 times the amount of violent crimes per 100,000 people committed in Great Britain, thus being a prime example that banning of guns does not necessarily mean less violent crimes.
  • Abuse
    No more war wrote...
    Stronger Gun Laws NOW!
    How many senseless killings have to occur until we finally get sticker gun control! ENOUGH!
    --> Listen to: 1480 AM, KPHX!...The Valley's Progressive Talk Radio for Phoenix!
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Gun violence far more frequently lethal
    Than other perpetrated acts of violence. Guns have changed balances of power in ways that arms length weaponry could not. They deserve special legislative considerations.
  • Abuse
    OneWonders wrote...
    Then Micho,
    lets get stricter laws for the criminal after they commit the crime and are found guilty! Lets get stricter on the laws about criminals lying on background checks! Oh wait, that's not what you want to do.
    Equal Justice, Not Social Justice.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Braid dead Libs think
    that a criminal who obtains a gun illegally now, won't obtain one illegally if a universal background check law is passed. Brain dead liberals think cosmetics on a gun make it more deadly. Brain dead liberals think two ten round magazines or in this case a 15 round magazine will do less damage. Brain dead liberals think the gun not the person is the problem.
  • Abuse
    1redcav wrote...
    All you
    progressive anti-gun hacks (abo/micho, no more war, et al) think the guns are the problem.....well, you're WRONG as usual....it's the looney bunch that are the problem...get with the friggin' program, and, quit drinknig the progressive liberal fool-aid...
  • Abuse
    SurpriseMe wrote...
    enforcing is hard to do
    how are you going to enforce private gun sales? I sold some guns privately and than reported them stolen. Is police going to go all out to investigate stolen guns? When I called to policy they took the entire report over the phone. Didnt want to come out to look at anything or dust for prints. lol.