Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Associated Press

HOUSTON (AP) - Prosecutors on Monday dropped charges against a 22-year-old man who authorities initially believed was involved in a shooting that wounded him and two others at a Houston-area community college.

Carlton Berry was arrested soon after the Jan. 22 shootings at Lone Star College and charged with two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. But authorities later accused another man, Trey Foster, 22, of being the shooter.

Foster has been charged with two counts of aggravated assault and faces a charge of resisting arrest in an earlier case. He was arrested Friday in the Dallas suburb of Plano.

Harris County Sheriff Adrian Garcia defended his agency's initial arrest of Berry, saying two of the victims initially indicated that Barry was the shooter. He also said Berry at first refused to talk to investigators, and it was only after he was charged that he pointed authorities to Foster.

"I support my investigators. I continue to support them," Garcia said. "I remain proud of their thoroughness and their relentless pursuit of the truth. They did what they were supposed to do."

Investigators say the shooting happened after 25-year-old Jody Neal bumped into Foster while Foster was walking with Berry. Foster and Neal argued but went their separate ways.

But when the two ran into each other 30 minutes later, they argued again and Foster fired at Neal, wounding him in the abdomen and leg. Berry also was shot and wounded, and a maintenance worker for the college, Bobby Cliburn, 55, was hit in the leg.

Authorities say at least 10 shots were fired, causing panic and a leading to a campus lockdown.

Berry's attorney, Robert A. Jones, said his client never should have been charged or jailed because the evidence showed he was a victim. Berry was shot in the left hip, which Jones said was an indication that Berry might have been facing away or running away from the shooter.

"He said that continually, whenever (authorities) talked to him, that he didn't do anything. But that wasn't enough. Then they started their investigation based upon his statement and they realized he didn't do anything," Jones said.

Prosecutor Alison Baimbridge said authorities dropped the charges in the interest of justice. She said that as with any investigation, the more witness interviews and evidence collecting that are done, authorities are "better able to determine who was where, what actually occurred."

Charges were formally dropped during a court hearing Monday, and Berry was later released from jail.

Foster made his initial court appearance Monday. He is being held on bonds totaling $100,000, and if he posts them, a judge ordered him subject to GPS monitoring and a curfew.

Quanell X, a community activist and a spokesman for Foster's family, said Foster told him Berry had nothing to do with the shooting. Berry and Foster apparently knew each other from school.

"It was inappropriate and wrong for Trey to have a pistol on campus," he said.

Quanell X said Foster legally bought the .40-caliber handgun authorities say was used in the shooting at a sporting goods store in Houston. Foster took a class for a concealed handgun license but had not completed the process to get a license, he said.

Garcia said investigators confirmed Foster bought the gun at the store, but noted there are questions about whether he should have been allowed to do so because of his criminal history.

Jess Myers, a spokesman for the sporting goods store, St. Paul, Minn.-based Gander Mountain, said the company couldn't provide firearms purchase records or comment on an ongoing investigation.

"Gander Mountain operates in strict compliance with all local, state and federal laws regarding firearms ownership and fully cooperates with law enforcement," Myers said in an email.

Quanell X said Foster bought the gun to defend himself after he was shot in the face a couple of years ago and had recently been receiving threats. He said Foster panicked during the shooting.

"He was very remorseful and sorry that innocent people got shot," he said.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

share this story:
facebook

25 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Disciple of Jefferson wrote...
    The Amendments...
    Micho, the 1st amendment was written by the same men who wrote the 2nd amendment. Why do feel you can interpret one of them as a "right", but not the other one? I challenge you to scrutinize the 2nd amendment in the same manner you cherish the 1st one.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    I have. The use of our First Amendment
    freedoms comes with restrictions. So does the Second. The government can set limits on the time, type and place of speech use. The government can likewise set limits on the time, type and size of arms possessed and used. None other than conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has done the same and agrees with me. By the way, you are the one putting words in my mouth and falsely claiming that I am saying the Second is not right. Why are you doing that?
  • Abuse
    Disciple of Jefferson wrote...
    Rights do not require government approval
    Did you have to ask Obama for permission to speak your mind today? Why do I have to ask him for permission to own a gun?
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    Between this,
    the NM shooting, and the CT shootings, it's starting to look like none of us is responsible enough to have any sort of firearm within reach. We must look like a country full of volatile mental cases to the rest of the world.
  • Abuse
    orichalcem wrote...
    Again, mass media is being
    used to persuade the people to allow new legislation in this country. This was an isolated incident, not a mass shooting. Wonder who's pulling the strings? When will the people realize they are being coaxed?
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    DOJ thinks he can say anything that he wants,
    anytime that he wants, anywhere that he wants. He really believes this. He thinks that he can walk into a courtroom in session and begin cussing out the Judge, lie to police, verbally misrepresent the sale he's trying to make, and finally walk into a crowded theater and yell fire. He thinks he can do this because he doesn't need the Government's permission to speak as he pleases. He brings the same skewed sensibilities to his considerations on gun control. Yikes.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    KTAR had posted an excellent article
    about the ineffective results of gun laws. Please read it, especially the anti gun kooks.
  • Abuse
    Zapotec wrote...
    Thanks for the heads up on the article, Steve
    I might have missed it otherwise. You and I both know it's not about reducing violence when it comes to gun control from the left. They don't have the guts to come out and just say exactly what they want, which is an eventual all out ban. Their aversion to guns is apparent, but they'll argue cosmetics and clip capacity today to inch their agenda along.
  • Abuse
    Zapotec wrote...
    Anti-gun liberals like to post all the stats
    they find online, but these studies never address contributing factors such as poverty, poor education, demographics, etc. It's just the numbers to them. It's just like the people who use prison population stats to further a racist agenda. We all know there are so many other contributing factors regarding the disproportionate minority prison population. If we just look at the numbers, though, idiots will come along and say "if we just get rid of, or reduce the number of minorities, the world would be a safer place." But that's why we have the Constitution. It protects us from idiots like that.
  • Abuse
    SurpriseMe wrote...
    obama's people
    did you read the study one tv station reported online over the weekend about the shooters since October the parents were registered democrats. Maybe the background checks should prevent democrats from owning guns.