Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
adam_lanza_5.jpg
Suspected shooter Adam Lanza is shown in this image from 2005. (Twitter photo/@ABC)

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) - Toxicology tests on the body of the Newtown school shooter did not turn up any alcohol, illegal drugs or prescription medications, an official close to the investigation said Tuesday.

Adam Lanza, 20, fatally shot 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14 before killing himself as police arrived. He also killed his mother at their Newtown home before going to the school.

The official said the toxicology tests were completed about five weeks ago and the results were turned over to Danbury State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky III, who is leading the investigation. The official, who was not authorized to publicly disclose the information and spoke on condition of anonymity, also said at least some victims' relatives were notified of the test results.

Toxicology tests check for a wide variety of over-the-counter medicines, prescription medications and illegal drugs. In Lanza's case, a separate test was performed for marijuana, which usually isn't part of toxicological reviews, and came back negative, the official said.

The test results, which were first reported by The Hartford Courant last week, leave many questions unanswered. Search warrants revealed that Lanza lived in a home surrounded by an arsenal of weapons, but authorities haven't revealed whether Lanza had been prescribed medications or whether he was diagnosed with any disorder that could help explain the massacre.

Illegal drugs and prescription medications were not on the lists of items found at Lanza's home, according to the warrants. Authorities said they did find medical, psychiatric and prescription records in the home, but didn't disclose the contents of those documents.

A state investigation report on the killings is expected to be publicly released this summer.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

share this story:
facebook

55 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Re Chemist
    You've shown us the freak and the mentally disturbed with your post.
  • Abuse
    Jim Sanson wrote...
    WHO CARES
    Who cares why mom had those GUNS. Those GUNS did not pull the trigger, but the psycho kid did. Get off the guns.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Anti-gun nuts such as
    Bloomberg say mass shootings only happen in America. Calls for bans and stricter laws but concedes it wouldn't have stop the massacre given the guns were legally purchased.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Well regulated militia
    The second amendment is very clear that the right to bear "arms" is designed for militias, which were necessary 200+ years ago to keep the British from controlling the country from London. The word "arms" means any device that could cause harm to others, or the animals you need to eat. But, like ever everything, times have changed. Those who think in the modern world that folks need auto and semi-auto guns that are really only useful for killing people, are the epitome of evil.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Re wrote
    The 2nd amendment was NOT entirely for a militia purpose. It was to protect people from government. Please refresh yourself with our founding fathers and constitution.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Interesting story
    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/12/16/Recently-Defeated-Connecticut-Mental-Health-Bill-May-Have-Stopped-Friday-s-Shooter
  • Abuse
    az83 wrote...
    Disarming
    innocent people does not protect innocent people. Guns are not the problem but the solution. Israel had school shootings until teachers were permitted to be armed. All these shootings occur in Gun Free Zones. When did criminals start obeying laws? End GFZs. Allow teachers and others the tools to protect our children and others. Many examples of mass murderers using items other than guns have occurred.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    No suggestion in any of my posts about
    disarming the law abiding. Finding ways to keep the dangerously mentally ill from getting access to tot killing guns is the order of the day. For some reason even this modest and eminently reasonable social good curdles the blood of gun nuts and the NRA.
  • Abuse
    OneWonders wrote...
    Hey Micho
    Prove me wrong?
    Equal Justice, Not Social Justice.
  • Abuse
    greatbison wrote...
    Figures
    One major party in this country wants to make it possible for anyone, without training, licensing, or tremendously rigorous background checks to get guns, including pistols and military grade hardware. Meanwhile, this same movement wants to make sure that access to proper health care - which would include mental health - continues to be financially oppressive. Go on, it's all about our imaginary freedoms. I suppose that some of those "patriots" whose blood waters the tree of liberty will also have to include kindergartners, who don't know a thing about politics.