Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

PHOENIX -- A state appeals court said a trial judge and a prosecutor were both wrong in taking rigid positions on whether plea agreements must prohibit using marijuana, whether medicinal or not.

Yavapai County Attorney Sheila Polk appealed after Superior Court Judge Cele Hancock deleted a provision against marijuana use from a criminal defendant's plea agreement.

Polk wanted to include the prohibitions in all plea agreements, while Hancock maintains that would improperly tie the judge's hands.

The Court of Appeals ruled that Hancock was wrong to take a blanket position and that it was appropriate for the one defendant's plea agreement to prohibit marijuana use.

The court also said Polk's blanket insistence on including marijuana-use prohibitions doesn't satisfy the prosecutor's duty to write plea agreements to fit individual cases' circumstances.

Associated Press,

share this story:
Attention KTAR.com Comment Users: We have recently changed our comments boards.
We would like you to be part of the conversation and The Voice of Arizona by logging in with your Facebook, Twitter, Google+ or Disqus account. Existing KTAR (Arizona Sports) account members will need to create a Disqus account or use one of the aforementioned social media logins. Thank you.
comments powered by Disqus

World Class Arizona

  • Dignity Health

    World Class People. World Class Company. Excellent care, delivered with compassion, for all in need.

Voice For A Better Arizona

  • Family in Focus

    KTAR spends the week taking a look at the issues a modern Arizona family faces.