Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
ap_teachers_guns.jpg
(AP Photo)

PHOENIX -- Republicans who control the Arizona Senate pushed through a bill Monday allowing designated teachers, administrators or other employees in rural schools to carry a handgun and allowing retired police officers who work in schools statewide to carry guns.

The bill sponsored by Sen. Rich Crandall, of Mesa, was approved on 17-11 party-line vote over the objections of Democrats, who failed to persuade any Republicans to oppose the bill they believe will bring added risk to schools. Democrats instead argued for more trained school resource officers, added mental health treatment and more school counselors to help prevent school violence.

Crandall's bill is the least sweeping of several legislative proposals to arm teachers prompted by December's school shooting in Newtown, Conn., and the national gun control debate, and it appears to be the one most likely to become law. It is based on a 6-year-old Texas law and applies only to rural schools that have 600 students or fewer, are at least 20 miles and 30 minutes from the nearest police station, and lack a school resource officer.

Crandall has said his bill is a measured response to school safety issues and is designed to provide some protection to rural schools that are far from law enforcement centers. Other bills that have yet to advance in the Legislature would allow any district to designate teachers or administrators who received proper training to carry firearms.

``This has been crafted very narrowly for those rural school districts in very unique circumstances only with significant training,'' Crandall told fellow senators.

The Senate last week turned back Democrat's efforts to add several provisions, including one that would have required law enforcement and parents be informed if a gun was lost or stolen.

Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, said on the Senate floor Monday that he opposed putting guns into the hands of lesser-trained people on campuses with students who are not yet developed enough to control their emotions. He also said he worried the bill would be amended by the House to expand its reach.

``I've heard members in the House say that they wanted to amend it to allow (guns) all over the state in all schools with less than 2,000 students, and I think that's a serious mistake,'' Farley said.

But Crandall said he doesn't support that, and tried to allay any fears.

``They have been very good in Texas not to extend it to include urban areas, it is still just a rural bill after six years,'' Crandall said. ``And I do think that's where we need to keep it at for the time being until there's a little more of a proven history of the role of self-defense in an urban school district.''

The bill now goes to the House for consideration.

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

8 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Let's hope the teachers don't turn the
    guns on unruly students.
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    A valid concern, however...
    I think the comment of a gun being used on a student is valid, and it needs to be debated. However, given the fact that there are already so many laws that prevent abuse against children, and that teachers can do very little against unruly students without getting in trouble, and that it doesn't require a gun to cause physical harm, I believe the benefits outweigh the risk. There definitely needs to be safeties put in place to minimize the risk of a tragedy, but overall believe this is a good step to protecting students.
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    Too bad they can't vote on
    giving the Teachers more money. Each year Teachers are given more responsibility, more students, higher health care costs, and less raises. At many schools, a teacher will find that financially they are moving backwards. Remember parents, you get what you pay for when it comes down to little Billy's or Sally's education. At least it's safe to say a Teacher is not in it for the money.
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    As far as a Teacher using a gun
    on an unruley student, at the very least, there are many students that could benefit from a good pistol whipping though. Aside from that, if a Teacher feels the need to use a weapon on a student, there's a good chance that the student is probably already better armed than the Teacher.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Pilots are armed if they choose
    why not teachers.
  • Abuse
    1redcav wrote...
    I'm all
    for arming teachers, but, let's make it for all schools, not just the rural areas.
  • Abuse
    az83 wrote...
    I agree with...
    ...Steve and 1redcav. Any teacher anywhere.
  • Abuse
    UZI wrote...
    Be on the lookout out for a planned crisis.
    The gov doesn't want us protecting ourselves, they what us to believe it's thier job. But as for armed teachers, require them to be proficient in use and mental apptitude and give them a good pay increase to provide incentive.
  • 1

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona