Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Teran_5.jpg
Raquel Teran, Arizona state director for Mi Familia Vota, said Legislature's focus should be on voter education. (Photo by AJ Vicens/Cronkite News)

PHOENIX -- Republican lawmakers' attempts to address the myriad problems that came up during last fall's election are being met with skepticism from Democratic lawmakers and advocacy groups.

The bills getting the most attention would purge some voters from the permanent early voting list, push up deadlines for returning early ballots and add additional steps for volunteers to collect others' ballots. Critics including state Sen. Steve Gallardo, D-Phoenix, say the bills are designed to counter growing minority voting participation.

"The only problem that we're fixing here is that participation is too high here in the state of Arizona, that minorities are coming out in larger numbers than ever before," Gallardo said.

Gallardo and Sens. Jack Jackson Jr., D-Window Rock, and Sen. Leah Landrum Taylor, D-Phoenix, the Senate minority leader, sent a letter Monday asking the Department of Justice to review the legislation as it moves from the Senate to the House.

"None of the established minority-voting advocacy groups were included in the drafting process and minority groups have not been asked for input," the letter said. "While we acknowledge that our vote counting system needs to be streamlined, changes cannot come at the expense of anyone's ability to vote."

Sen. Michele Reagan, R-Scottsdale, who chairs the Senate's Elections Committee, said attacks on the bills are political theater.

"What I think we've gotten to at this point is it's not about policy, it's not about making the bill better, it's about making press," Reagan said. "I don't feel (the bills) disenfranchise voters. They keep saying that, and I keep asking to show me where it disenfranchises people."

Reagan pointed to SB 1003, which she authored, as a prime example. The bill would require a voter to sign the outside of an early ballot envelope and specifically identify the person he or she gave permission to submit the ballot.

"Why is it such a big deal to say that the voter can designate if they want someone to drop something off?" Reagan said. "If you have people going around and collecting ballots without voters approval, that should not be allowed."

Landrum Taylor said the problem with SB 1003 is that it is attempting to fix a problem that doesn't exist.

"Typically when you're going forward with a measure like this you are fixing something," she said. "So if there were multiple cases of fraud coming forward then you could understand having to take drastic measures of this nature, but we have not identified or seen any of those cases."

Raquel Teran, Arizona state director for Mi Familia Vota, said Legislature's focus should be on voter education. Her organization mobilizes volunteers, many of them young people from the community, to encourage Latino participation in the electoral process.

SB 1261, which would remove voters from the permanent early voting list if they haven't voted in the last two elections, would significantly affect Latinos, she said. In 2008 there were about 95,000 Latinos counties' lists, she said. By 2012 that number was 225,000.

"You don't have to register to get a gun but you have to register to collect someone's ballot? What is going to be next?" she said. "What is going to be the next step for them to make it more difficult for people to vote?"

Reagan said she's met with every group that wanted to discuss election legislation and concerns. She provided Cronkite News Service access to her calendar, which shows meetings with the Arizona Advocacy Network, the League of Women Voters and Mi Familia Vota, among others.

But Brendan Walsh, executive director of Central Arizonans for a Sustainable Economy, a civil rights and civic participation group, said the meetings all came after the legislation was mostly written. Even then, most of the established Latino voting advocacy groups weren't included, he said.

Walsh said the proposed bills will have the net effect of reducing voter participation.

"Right now these bills are attacking, I think, the effectiveness of largely volunteer organizations to encourage people in their communities to vote," he said.

share this story:
facebook

9 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Linebacker wrote...
    Being removed from
    the early voting list because you have NOT VOTED in two years, does not stop you from voting. You would just have to go to the polling place. Plus you could re-register if you decided to vote. My belif is the reason you did not vote for two years is 1. either you left the state or 2. You were deported. I think we need a law stating all ballots and government paper work be printed in English only. Imagine how much money the state and city gov. would save in printing.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Republican voter suppression efforts
    continue apace. They will try to create as many obstacles to voting as they can which disproportionately affect the poor and minorities. This is part of the Republican Party's dying effort to beat back the rising tide of the Hispanic electorate. A short term slap in the face of Hispanics which will cost the Repubs in the long run.
  • Abuse
    No more war wrote...
    BOOOO to The Repubs!
    ....BOOOO to The Repubs! So over their shallow rhetoric, esp from Hannity & O'Reiily!
    --> Listen to: 1480 AM, KPHX!...The Valley's Progressive Talk Radio for Phoenix!
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    "...disproportionately affect the poor and
    minorities" Don't know about the poor, but as for minorities, it appears that only the Hispanics are having issues with this. There's other minorities in Arizona, when do we get to hear their side of it? Or don't they count as much as Hispanics because their numbers are less? Personally, I would like to hear more from other minority groups than just the Hispanic population to get a better perspective of the alleged racial basis that I keep hearing repeated by the Hispanic population and liberals.
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    @No more war
    You work for KPHX, don't you.
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    How are they being supressed? (1)
    I don't see how voters (meaning legal citizens who are registered to vote) are being suppressed from voting. I vote every time there is an election, whether local or national, and have never had a problem other than having to confirm my new address when I moved, which was easy enough to do with some documents such as utility bills. I have heard of some extreme cases where an individual (notice not a group of people) provided info but individuals at the polling center did not handle the situation correctly causing the person to not be able to vote.
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    How are they being surpressed? (2)
    And I totally agree in those situations that what happened is wrong and needs to be corrected. I have also heard of extreme cases such as groups like the Black Panthers having members outside of voting polls intimidating and threatening people they did not want going into the poll. This is also something I would completely oppose and agree would be a suppression to my right to vote, and needs to be corrected. But other than extreme scenarios like this, where one applies to individuals, not groups, wherein do these laws suppress the right to vote?
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    How are they being suprpressed? (3)
    If you are not able to vote due to not being registered, then get registered, everybody else has to do it and it's not that hard, especially with having the info you need available online. If you need ID, get it, because you need it for just about everything from going to the bank to buying a prescription at the pharmacy, or even receiving welfare. Overall I don't see how any of these laws suppress any particular group of legal citizens. It does suppress efforts from those that are not citizens from voting, which I have no problem with whatsoever.
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    As a parting thought...
    Why is it that there are groups like Latino voting advocacy groups and so forth? Last time I checked, we (i.e. citizens) are all Americans. We are not Irish, English, German, Latino, Asian, African, etc. people, we are Americans. We all come from diverse backgrounds, but we all are citizens of one country, and should therefore not refer ourselves as anything less than Americans. I personally would find it degrading if somebody called me German-American, or African-American, as it would suggest that somehow I'm not truly American and should be treated differently in the land of equality.
  • 1

World Class Arizona

  • Go Daddy

    World Class People. World Class Company. Go Daddy is a Fortune 100 "Best Companies to Work For."
  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona