Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) - Former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and her husband, Mark Kelly, keep pushing for stricter gun laws as they continue to own weapons for recreational purposes, including the same type of gun used in the January 2011 shooting rampage that left Giffords wounded.

However, the couple's 9 mm Glock holds fewer bullets than the one used the Tucson shooting spree. Limiting the size of ammunition magazines is one of the goals of a new political action committee formed by Giffords and Kelly.

The couple was interviewed in Tucson by CNN for a segment that aired Tuesday evening.

Kelly was shown shooting pots and water bottles off large rocks in a desert area with Giffords watching from a porch.

For target practice, Kelly said he uses a 9 mm Glock with a magazine that can hold 17 rounds. That's the same kind of handgun that Jared Lee Loughner used when he opened fire outside a Tucson supermarket during a meet-and-greet event organized by Giffords. The shooting injured Giffords and 12 others and left six people dead.

"In that case, it had a magazine that held 33 rounds," Kelly said. "He shot 33 rounds. Every round hit somebody, we think."

Kelly, a former astronaut who wasn't present at the Tucson shooting, said Loughner walked directly toward Giffords and shot her once in the head before directing fire at the crowd around her. He said Loughner released all 33 bullets in 15 seconds.

Kelly and Giffords have formed a political action committee in hopes of preventing gun violence and changing laws to require compulsory background checks for gun buyers. The PAC also will work to limit the size of ammo magazines and to ban the sale of assault weapons to civilians.

The couple believes they have credibility in the gun control debate because they are longtime gun owners who support Second Amendment rights.

Giffords resigned from Congress last year and still is recovering from her injuries.

Asked by CNN about the shooting, Giffords said she is not resentful about what happened.

"No. Move ahead. Move ahead," she said, adding that she wants to be "stronger, better, tougher."

Loughner, 24, was sentenced in November to seven consecutive life sentences, plus 140 years, after he pleaded guilty to 19 federal charges in the Tucson shooting.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

share this story:
facebook

53 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    A wasted effort
    Democrats are so desperate to do something that they let brain drain get in the way of rational thinking. They don't want to accept that the laws we already have go unenforced and unprosecuted. They don't want to accept that bad guys get guns now without a background check and will continue if they push their agenda further. A number of known shooters have passed background checks, but were mentally unstable. Democrats are not willing to address the real issues.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Gun nuts and the NRA continue to lose ground.
    The trade group for the nation’s leading firearm manufacturers said it will not actively oppose the expansion of background checks, which are designed to prevent guns from reaching criminals or the seriously mentally ill. “That’s more the NRA’s issue,†Steve Sanetti, president of the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), said in an interview. “From the commercial side, we’re already there, and we’ve been there, and we were the ones that have been the strongest proponents of an effective, complete background check.â€
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Which
    won't stop one crime. The bad guys that want guns will get them.
  • Abuse
    misterosr wrote...
    Micho
    you just made Steve's point. Why would they oppose background checks when they've already proved to be totally ineffective in curbing gun violence. Since the Brady Bill gun violence has steadily, year after year, increased. In every place where they have banned guns in any way, gun violence has also steadily increased. In fact, in DC the gun violence increased SHARPLY after the ban.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Will probably stop many crimes.
    But certainly not every crime. Only a gun nut would believe that any law would stop all of the crime that it is intended to address. If that were the case, gun nuts would have opposed 1070 since there's no way it's going to stop all illegal immigration.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Misterioso, cite your sources and provide
    some links. I'm guessing your pulling your suppositions out of the air.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Liberal thuggery
    a group of big city mayors wrote to major gun manufacturers Monday, warning that their governments may begin using economic leverage to win support for increased regulation, including an extension of background checks.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Go where the money is
    Gun store owners and retail dealers for the most part have been more vocal in supporting an expansion of background checks. An expanded background check requirement probably would increase traffic and business for licensed dealers.
  • Abuse
    az83 wrote...
    If gun control...
    worked Chicago should be one of the safest cities in the country. Criminals do not follow laws. UBC may sound not too bad on the surface but dig a little deeper and it's very bad. We need to look at the reason for the violence not the means. Anyone saying they are against gun violence is misguided, what about acts of violence carried out with other weapons? Only shows they are not against violence, they are against guns.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Common sense even eludes some on
    these boards. They're so dillusional and desperate to regulate that common sense is not found among them.

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona