Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

PHOENIX -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's appeal of a ruling that criticized a decision by his jail officers to force pink underwear onto a mentally ill inmate who erroneously believed jailers were trying to rape him.

The refusal by the court means the lawsuit by the estate of Eric Vogel is one step closer toward having a second trial.

Arpaio's office won the case at trial, but the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the verdict and called for a new trial in a ruling a year ago.

The 9th Circuit said dressing inmates in pink underwear- a hallmark of Arpaio _ appeared to be punishment without legal justification and noted that it's fair to infer that the selection of pink as the underwear color was meant to symbolize the loss of prisoners' masculinity.

Arpaio aide Jack MacIntyre said the sheriff still has a request for the 9th Circuit to reconsider the ruling and he's confident of the agency's chances because it has the law on its side.

``The 9th Circuit decision that we have thus far hasn't changed law in this circuit,'' MacIntyre said. The 9th Circuit denied a similar reconsideration request in November.

Joel Robbins, a lawyer for Vogel's estate, said he believes the sheriff will try to bring the case before the Supreme Court again. ``I don't believe the Supreme Court will waste its time hearing this appeal,'' Robbins said.

Early in his 20-year tenure as sheriff, Arpaio won points with voters for making inmates wear pink underwear, housing them in canvas tents during triple-digit summer heat, and dressing them in old-time striped jail uniforms.

Arpaio's attorneys wanted the nation's highest court to examine whether having pink boxers as part of the standard jail uniform can constitute punishment before a trial is held.

Vogel had refused to get out of his street clothes after he was arrested in 2001 for investigation of assaulting an officer who was responding to a burglary call. A group of officers in the jail stripped Vogel and put him in pink underwear and other prison clothing as he shouted that he was being raped.

A lawyer for Vogel's estate has said the officers didn't sexually assault Vogel and that his client didn't suffer injuries at the jail.

Vogel, who was determined by a counselor to be paranoid and psychotic, died less than a month later, after he and his mother got in a minor car accident. When an officer handling the accident told Vogel that he might be jailed on a warrant stemming from his previous struggle involving jail clothes, Vogel ran several miles from the scene back to his home.

He died the next day, and medical examiners concluded the cause was cardiac arrhythmia.

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

13 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    "...it's fair to infer that the selection of pink
    as the underwear color was meant to symbolize the loss of prisoners' masculinity." This may be true if you are the only inmate wearing that color, but not if everyone is wearing the same thing. This is ridiculous, give them ten bucks and send them to Walmart for a 3 pack, lawsuit settled. Personally I think if jails appeared to be less inviting, crime might actually drop. Doubt it though, some are just too stupid for their own good.
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    The 9th Circut court...
    is the bane of this country. It seems virtually every case I hear handled by them has the most ridiculous panel of justices that seem to believe that the constitution only applies in instances that is convenient to the current administration, and that criminals (both legal and illegal) should be treated with the upmost respect as thought they were a law abiding citizens. There seems to be no room for common sense or actual use of law. For the sake of this country they should all be removed.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Another fine example of Arpaio's extra legal
    jailing practices (aimed at humiliating, not deterring) creating another huge financial liability for County taxpayers.
  • Abuse
    OneWonders wrote...
    Really
    Micho, pink is humiliating? I don't think so but then again I am secure enough in my masculinity, logic and common sense that wearing pink isn't a big deal. Stop being such wimps and grow up people!
    Equal Justice, Not Social Justice.
  • Abuse
    Zapotec wrote...
    Come on guys!!!
    Who's going to coddle these criminals if the 9th Circuit doesn't. While they're at, why don't they restore their cable tv, pornography, and tobacco rights that Arpaio has so unconstitutionally stripped from them.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Girlie men?
    The 9th probably has 'girlie men' on their minds with this ruling. I wonder if the NFL became girly men when they wore pink for the whole month of October.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Your wife and kids have seen
    you prancing around in your pink boxers, 1/1. For the rest of us, tmi.
  • Abuse
    1redcav wrote...
    What's wrong
    with these thugs wearing pink boxers? If they would've stayed out of trouble & not committed a crime (i.e., illegally crossing the border), they wouldn't have to wear them! Problem solved!
  • Abuse
    USCitizen wrote...
    The purpose for pink...
    was so that the inmates would not steal the underwear when they were released, not to make them feel unmanly. They have pink socks too! When inmates were being released from jail they were given the cloths they were arrested in and some would rather steal underwear paid for by tax payers rather than put on their old crusties, the pink underwear cut down on that.
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    @USCitizen
    Thank you for the reminder. I knew there was a financial reason for this, but did not recall the details. MCSO/Sheriff Joe have done many things to help keep costs down to reduce the burden on the taxpayer, but yet no one seems to appreciate that. Guess some would be more happy with higher taxes and comfortable criminals.

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona