Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
28-kolbe-full.jpg
Former Arizona Rep. Jim Kolbe was one of more than 100 Republicans who signed on to briefs supporting same-sex marriage in two cases being considered by the U.S. Supreme Court. He was joined by a range of groups filing briefs on Thursday's deadline. (Cronkite News Service photo by Connor Radnovich)

WASHINGTON - Former Arizona Rep. Jim Kolbe joined representatives of business, church and civil-rights groups Thursday to file briefs supporting same-sex marriage in two upcoming Supreme Court cases on the issue.

Kolbe, who married his partner in Washington, D.C., said civil unions are no longer sufficient and that now is the time for marriage equality for gay couples across the country.

"There was a time when gay marriage seemed like just a vision so far in the future that it didn't even seem possible," Kolbe said. "Times have changed, and I think now we recognize that civil unions doesn't do it. We need to have more. We need to have the full equality."

He was one of nine speakers at a news conference intended to show the breadth of same-sex marriage supporters. Each of the speakers had signed on to various friend-of-the-court briefs.

Thursday was the deadline to file briefs in the high court's consideration next month of California's Proposition 8, which defines marriage as being between a man and a woman.

Friday is the deadline for briefs in the court's consideration of the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law that also says marriage is between a man and a woman.

The court will hear the Hollingsworth v. Perry, the Proposition 8 case, on March 26; U.S. v. Windsor, the DOMA case, will be heard on March 27.

The two cases have already attracted dozens of briefs, both from supporters and from opponents as varied as a group of Republican senators and the Westboro Baptist Church.

Kolbe is one of more than 100 Republicans who signed one of the briefs supporting gay marriage, according to the Respect for Marriage Coalition, which hosted the news conference. The Republicans include former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, Hewlett-Packard President and CEO Meg Whitman and Beth Myers, former manager for Mitt Romney's presidential campaign.

Other groups at the news conference included Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, former members of the military, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, among others.

Kolbe said the ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act could affect an Arizona case currently "conferenced" by the court - meaning the justices have not decided if they will hear it or not. The case, Brewer v. Diaz, challenges the state's law that denies health benefits to domestic partners of state employees.

Kolbe said if the court strikes down DOMA, it would be difficult for states to find legal ground for treating same-sex and heterosexual couples differently. Once the court rules, he said, he expects Arizona will "come along very quickly on this issue."

"It's evolving in Arizona the same way it's evolving everywhere else," Kolbe said.

But Center for Arizona Policy President Cathi Herrod said there is no telling how the DOMA case would affect the state or the Diaz case until after a ruling is handed down. The center supports traditional marriage.

"Until we have the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, offering any opinion on a potential impact to Arizona is pure conjecture," she wrote in an email.

Kolbe compared current laws that ban gay marriage to past laws that did not let people of different races marry. Those laws are often looked back on in disbelief, he said, and he thinks someday there will be a similar response to the current restrictions on same-sex marriage.

"I think we recognize that now is the time to strike and to make this change," Kolbe said.

share this story:
facebook

7 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    sick
    what has happen to the moral fiber of this country.....the other nations of the world look disgusingly at us
  • Abuse
    UZI wrote...
    We have marriage equality.
    I can't marry of the same gender either. A better argument would be for "Marriage Quality". There's ample reason for not having same sex marriage, nonmanogomous, beastiality, incestual, etc. I gurantee you that if you ask a gay person to advocate for equal marriage they will draw the line against some other form than what they want. Ask them if polygamy should be allowed. They say no and they says its wrong.
  • Abuse
    1redcav wrote...
    NO!
    ABSOLUTELY NOT! God created Adam & Eve, NOT Adam & Steve! I do not, and, will not EVER support same-sex marriage!
  • Abuse
    OldDaveNJ wrote...
    @UZI
    While I've heard well-reasoned arguments as to why non-monogamous, bestial, incestuous, etc. marriages shouldn't be covered under civil marriage laws, I've never heard a single coherent, constitutionally-valid argument for not recognizing same-gender civil marriage. All I ever hear are religious reasons (irrelevant as per the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment) or misrepresentations of what scientific research and the US Constitution has to say about the matter.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Jim Kolbe served the conservative
    5th and 8th Comgressional District capably for more than two decades, winning reelection repeatedly, even after coming out gay. Interestingly, the fabric of the universe was not torn asunder as a consequence. Gay marriage has no effect on anyone else's relationships. Only busybodies are troubled.
  • Abuse
    triplesix wrote...
    Change
    Kolbe said "times have changed". I find interesting the people of "these times" who place their wants/needs above all the knowledge and wisdom of all previous civilization.
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    You can't say equal and only apply one.
    OldDaveNJ has argued that nobody has made a comment about the legality of banning same sex marriage. Yet I think UZI's comment is well made, there have been federal laws regarding what type of marriage is legal and what is not for over 100 years. So to the argument of whether or not the government can makes laws regarding marriage restrictions, the answer is yes. Also, how can anybody say they want "equal marriage rights" when they are only focusing on one group getting rights for marriage. I personally don't support polygamy or same-sex marriages.
  • 1

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona