Updated Jan 28, 2013 - 2:40 pm
John McCain releases Q & A on new immigration framework
Sen. John McCain released the following question-and-answer session about new framework for immigration reform that was approved by senators on Monday.
It has not been altered in any way.
Q. What are the major differences between this legislation and what was last proposed in 2007?
A: Many of the problems we faced in 2007 remain today. Fortunately, so do many of the solutions. What has changed significantly is the number of people coming across the border illegally. In fact, net migration from Mexico is zero. The struggling economy plays a big part in this, but so does the increases in Border Patrol agents, newly deployed technologies, and improved infrastructure that has been built out over the past decade.
Q: This isn't the first time you've tried to pass bipartisan immigration reform. Why do you think it will pass this time?
A: The politics of the issue have changed, and changed dramatically. If you look at the polls when it comes to immigration reform that includes a path to citizenship for certain immigrants without papers, the American people are there. Americans support it, and it's the right thing to do.
Q. Republicans have been saying since 2007 that until the border is secure immigration reform should not be addressed. At what point did the border become secure?
A: We still have work to do along the border. Customs and Border Protection need new and better technology to monitor and detect drug smugglers and other illegal entries. However, there has been a 70 percent reduction in apprehensions from 2005 to today and net migration from Mexico is at zero. Now is the time to take on comprehensive reform.
Q. Will this proposal do anything to combat drug trafficking along the Southwest border?
A. Yes. Arizona is currently a major smuggling corridor and distribution hub for drug trafficking organizations. In fact, over 36 percent of marijuana drug seizures along the Southwest border take place in Arizona. Creating a guest worker program to provide a legal system that allows immigrant workers to enter the country will enable Border Patrol to focus on drug smugglers and other serious criminals.
Q. How will the proposal enhance our national security?
A. Under the current unworkable system, our Border Patrol agents spend too much time going after people entering the country looking for work and not on drug smugglers and terrorists. Border Patrol apprehend roughly 400,000 illegal immigrants trying to cross into the country each year, and many more manage to slip by them - all without vetting or controls of any kind. Our proposal seeks to end this unacceptable state of affairs by funneling laborers into a legal guest worker program, freeing up federal agents to focus their energy on securing the border and protecting Americans against terrorists and criminals.
Our proposal will also enhance security within the United States by encouraging millions of currently undocumented workers to come forward and register with the government. The goal: to shrink and eventually eliminate the undocumented population, to dry up the smuggling trade and put document forgers out of business - depriving would-be terrorists of the illegal support system they currently exploit in immigrant communities.
Q. Will this legislation help reduce the violence and other chaos that illegal immigration currently generates in border states - the trespassing, the smuggler violence, the deaths along the frontier?
A. Yes, that is one of the primary goals of our plan. A guest worker program is designed to give workers coming illegally to do jobs we need done a safe, orderly, legal way to enter the United States. Most will prefer the new legal path. Those wishing to come to America to work will no longer have to risk the long, dangerous, illegal journey. There will be less and less demand for the services of smugglers: in addition to safety issues, it will be cheaper to come the legal way. And authorized migrants will cross the border at our designated ports of entry, restoring the rule of law to the lands along the border.
Q. Won't this bill lead to more illegal immigration?
A. No. The goal of the bill is to replace the current illegal flow with legal workers by giving the foreign workers our economy needs a safe, orderly, legal way to enter the country. Once every available job is filled by an authorized worker, and it is impossible - as it will be under this program - to get work without a valid visa, there will be much less incentive for other migrants to cross the border illegally. Far fewer employers will need to resort to illegal workers, and those who do - the truly unscrupulous, exploitative minority - can be targeted with enforcement and tough new penalties.
Q. Won't the new, temporary workers undercut American workers by taking their jobs?
A. No. As study after study of the labor market shows, American workers don't generally compete with immigrants - they don't generally want the low-paying, low-skilled jobs that immigrant workers come to fill. Our native-born work force is getting older. It's shrinking - remember, our birth rates are falling. As a nation we are more and more educated. In 1960, half of all American men dropped out of high school and went into the unskilled labor force. Today only 10 percent of the native-born drop out. And few American families now raise their children to be busboys or to work out in the fields.
Further, our legislation will include a variety of measures designed to protect U.S. workers. We agree that any legislation should mandate that employers who are considering hiring an immigrant worker must first try to hire a U.S. worker.
Q. How will this program be funded?
A. The program will be funded in large part by fees collected from immigrant workers - both new guest workers and the previously undocumented. The monies will be used for registering the undocumented, processing visas and other applications, enhancing enforcement, and providing English and civics education to immigrants.
Q. Would your principles provide additional government entitlements for immigrants?
A. No. Our proposal would make no changes to current law regarding what federal benefits immigrants are eligible for.
Q. Does your proposal plan to do anything to help the people waiting patiently in line in their home countries?
A. Yes. We all agree that we must reduce backlogs in the family and employment visa categories so that future immigrants view our future legal immigration system as the exclusive means for entry into the United States. We will also reform the system to reduce the likelihood of future backlogs.
Q. But won't the program still reward people who have broken the law at the expense of those who have followed the rules and waited their turn outside the country?
A. No. Individuals who are present without lawful status will only receive a green card after every individual who is already waiting in line for a green card, at the time this legislation is enacted, has received their green card. No one who has violated America's immigration laws will receive preferential treatment as they relate to those individuals who have complied with the law.