Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
FILE - In this May 20, 2013 file photo, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., left, confers with Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., center, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., as the Senate Judiciary Committee assembled to work on a landmark immigration bill to secure the border and offer citizenship to millions, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Leading senators working on immigration legislation reached a compromise Tuesday on the details of an expanded high-tech visa program, officials said as the Senate Judiciary Committee neared completion of its work on the measure. At the same time, several officials said the White House has made it known to Leahy that it would prefer postponing a showdown over the rights of same sex spouses until a vote in the full Senate. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) - A key House committee chairman on Wednesday sharply criticized a wide-ranging immigration bill just passed by a Senate committee, underscoring the difficulties ahead as the politically volatile measure moves forward in a divided Congress.

Separately, a bipartisan House group that has been working behind the scenes to craft its own immigration measure encountered fresh difficulties.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., argued that the bill passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee on a bipartisan vote Tuesday "falls far short" of what is needed to end the problem of illegal immigration, and is unlikely to secure the border.

"While I commend the Senate for their continuing efforts to tackle the extremely difficult task of reforming our broken system, I must observe that S. 744 repeats many of the mistakes of the past," Goodlatte said at a hearing of his committee on the legislation. "We have serious concerns."

Goodlatte's critique was echoed by other Republicans on his panel. "I cannot find any deadline by which the border needs to be secure" under the legislation, complained Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas.

Their comments came the day after the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 13 to 5 to advance the measure to the full Senate, with three Republicans joining the Democratic majority. The bill would aim to enact new border controls and enforcement mechanisms in the workplace, allow tens of thousands of workers into the country legally for high- and low-skilled jobs, and create a 13-year path to citizenship for the 11 million people already here illegally.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., pledged Wednesday to bring the measure to the Senate floor in June after Congress returns from its Memorial Day recess. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he would support a vote to begin debate on the measure, although he said he remained undecided about supporting it.

"I'm undecided about the bill, but I'm not undecided about the problem," McConnell said on Fox News Channel. "The border is unsecure and we need to fix it. So I've not decided yet whether this is the bill to do that, but we've got a serious problem along the border."

Meanwhile there were new setbacks for a bipartisan House group that has been working to finalize its own measure along the lines of the Senate bill.

The group of eight lawmakers, four Democrats and four Republicans, has been promising for months to release the legislation but has encountered numerous difficulties as it tries to get a deal that could get through the Republican-controlled House while also satisfying Democratic concerns. Late last week, after reports that talks had stalled, lawmakers insisted they had an "agreement in principle." But on Wednesday lawmakers and aides said the group had new problems arising from a dispute over how to handle health care for immigrants here illegally.

Republicans in the group are trying to establish a system to ensure that no taxpayer money goes to pay for health care for people here illegally. Democrats in the group thought they had come up with a mechanism that could satisfy that concern at least well enough to act as a placeholder so the group could release the legislation, two House aides said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the private deliberations. One aide described the solution as a fund to be paid for by fees in the bill to reimburse states and local governments any costs of health care for those in the country illegally.

But, according to the aides, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and other Democratic leaders objected over concerns that the legislation moved too far to the right and into areas outside of the purview of the immigration group. That caused Democratic members of the group to back off the deal.

"They had agreed to that until Democrat leadership objected," Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, a member of the group, told reporters.

"What may be the story at the end of this session is that Obamacare killed immigration reform," Labrador said.

A House Democratic leadership aide, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations, said House Democratic leaders were not trying to interfere with the House immigration group, or slow it down, but simply trying to clarify the language.

Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., a member of the immigration group who also is a member of House leadership as Democratic Caucus chairman, said group members were still talking in pursuit of a deal.

"I think the eight of us are trying very hard to make a deal," Becerra said. "I think everyone, both the Republican and Democratic leadership, are working hard to try to get a deal that could get past the House."

___

Associated Press writer Luis Alonso Lugo contributed to this report.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

126 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    gmm wrote...
    Their plan is only good in theory
    The plan means squat if they don't close the border and restrict and enforce employmeny and benefit laws internally. Let's be fair. Close the border, all of it, make no exceptions for those who cross illegally; beef up E-verify and link Social Security to the IRS to prevent ID theft for employment; deny benefits unless you are a legal citizens. Crack down on employers who hire illegals. No citizenship for convicted criminals. All illegals wanting citizenship go to the end of the line and wait for those who have applied legally, and have done the right thing.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Unions are a dying breed
    In their last attempts of survival they are now pandering to immigrants.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    I dont know why the GOP EVEN WORRIES
    About this trash they don't vote republican any way.Who's going to vote against their welfare checks anyway?
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    Angelica Salas says, "people should be
    able to choose citizenship if they want and not be stuck in legal limbo." Couldn't agree more...however, this applies if you enter the Country through legal channels, not by jumping the fence. They are already looking at giving 11 million or more illegal aliens a free pass to remain, now they want to jump to the front of the line and become citizens ahead those already in the system legally. You want this to work? It's going to require a little give and take, not just all take.
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    New Sovereignty?
    Last time I check the United States was a sovereign nation, meaning that we make and dictate our own laws. Where in the world do these "immigration" activists get the idea that we should change our laws because citizens of other countries want us to? Does any other country in the world allow illegal immigrants into their country without consequences? Mexico has very strict laws including that illegal immigrants will not receive benefits, employment, and will be actively pursed and punished by the law.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Obama buying the vote
    The Department of Agriculture Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack is featured in a radio ad urging Hispanic and women farmers and ranchers who believe USDA discriminated against them to file claims for a piece of $1.33 billion in cash awards and tax relief payments and up to $160 million in farm debt relief set aside as Obama's part of “a new era of civil rightsâ€
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Closed doors negotiations
    Gotta love transparency.
  • Abuse
    misterosr wrote...
    gmm is absolutely right.
    Take away all of the incentives and make it so unprofitable for employers won't hire them and they will leave on their own and only illegals left will be drug runners and other criminals.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    fight it,,,we cannot afford it.....
    this is one i will fight...we cannot afford this..this country is broke,,and the gang of eight does not care....they are totally uresponsible to the people of this country
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    They need to address the big issue
    The 14th amendment. Widely abused and misinterpreted.

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona