Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
FILE - These file photos shows Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., left and Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., the Senators warned Sunday June 13, 2013 that Republicans' hopes to reclaim the White House in the 2016 elections hinge on whether they support _ or sabotage _ the immigration overhaul being debated in the Senate. (AP Photo/

WASHINGTON (AP) - Republicans' hopes to reclaim the White House in the 2016 elections hinge on whether they support- or sabotage- the immigration overhaul being debated in the Senate, two lawmakers who helped write the proposal warn.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., on Sunday told conservatives who are trying to block the measure that they will doom the party and all but guarantee a Democrat will remain in the White House after 2016's election. Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., went a step further and predicted "there'll never be a road to the White House for the Republican Party" if immigration overhaul fails to pass.

The Senate is moving forward with an overhaul and appears to be on track to have a vote from the full Senate by July 4. A timeline for a House proposal is less certain, although leaders say they are working on plans that more closely follow conservatives' wish list.

The Senate last week overcame a procedural hurdle in moving forward on the first immigration overhaul in a generation. Lawmakers from both parties voted to begin formal debate on a proposal that would give an estimated 11 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally a long and difficult path to citizenship.

The Senate legislation also creates a low-skilled guest-worker program, expands the number of visas available for high-tech workers and de-emphasizes family ties in the system for legal immigration that has been in place for decades. It also sets border security goals that the government must meet before immigrants living in the U.S. illegally are granted any change in status.

Meanwhile, one of the proposal's authors, who is considering a White House campaign, refused again to pledge support for the measure without changes conservatives have demanded.

"I think 95, 96 percent of the bill is in perfect shape and ready to go. But there are elements that need to be improved," said Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.

Republicans are demanding tougher border security measures and stricter standards for who qualifies for government programs such as Social Security and health care.

Rubio is trying to balance concerns from his party's conservative flank, which has great sway in picking a nominee, with the political attempt to win over Hispanic and Asian-American voters who overwhelmingly favored President Barack Obama's re-election in 2012. Further complicating Rubio's presidential aspirations, the Republican-led House hews toward tea partyers.

"After eight years of President Obama's economic policies, and, quite frankly, foreign policy, people are going to be looking around," Graham said. "But if we don't pass immigration reform, if we don't get it off the table in a reasonable, practical way, it doesn't matter who you run in 2016. We're in a demographic death spiral as a party and the only way we can get back in good graces with the Hispanic community, in my view, is pass comprehensive immigration reform. If you don't do that, it really doesn't matter who we run."

In 2012, Obama won re-election with the backing of 71 percent of Hispanic voters and 73 percent of Asian voters. A thwarted immigration overhaul could again send those voting blocs to Democrats' side. That has led some Republican lawmakers to support immigration reform, but the party's conservative base still opposes any legislation that would create a pathway to citizenship for immigrants living here illegally.

Democrats are well aware of the numbers.

"I would tell my Republican colleagues, both in the House and the Senate, that the road to the White House comes through a road with a pathway to legalization," Menendez said. "Without it, there'll never be a road to the White House for the Republican Party."

Graham spoke on NBC's "Meet the Press." Menendez was interviewed on CNN's "State of the Union." Rubio was on ABC's "This Week."

___

Follow Philip Elliott on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/philip_elliott


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

146 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Food for thought
    Immigration agents have been left with no recourse but to sue their own Department, simply so that they like any other law officers will be allowed to do their job. The first task for every media agency in the country ought to be to study this lawsuit, to listen to the long documented complaints of ICE agents and to review the record of stymied attempts at congressional oversight of DHS. What good are promises of future enforcement when the Administration covertly undermines those laws now in place?
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The cost
    Creating a path to citizenship for so many illegal aliens would result in significant costs to state, local and federal governments. An often cited 2004 study that illegal immigrants paying taxes and getting access to such social services as Medicaid or food stamps would cost taxpayers $29 billion annually. Illegal aliens create a large deficit is not their heavy use of social services but their lack of education, which results in low paying jobs and small income tax contributions. If you think Obamacare is screwed up now just wait and see if Amnesty is passed.
  • Abuse
    1redcav wrote...
    Just say NO
    to amnesty!
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Steve throws his support behind a union
    which fights for what it sees as better working conditions. Oddly, he doesn't support other unions that want better and safer working conditions. Still, it's good to see his change of heart in backing the working man and collective action.
  • Abuse
    gilbert armenta wrote...
    It really is reassuring
    to hear all these people continuing to want to fight this. What that means is the GOP will continue to lose and ultimately be incapable of much of anything. Keep up the good fight you hardline GOPers, that's worked very well these past few years.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Have the GOP considered
    That Mitt Romney was the problem at the ballot box? This is an action which is doomed to failure. Current illegals have no desire to "pay" for their citizenship, as this bill basically requires. It will fail.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The illegal are counting on Obama
    He is their Moses...leading them to the promised land.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    CIR will turn out to be a joke
    completely watered down by Obama and nothing will happen.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Please define "Border Security"
    Talk about a nebulous term ~ does anyone have a definition of Border Security? The border with Mexico runs 2,000 miles from Baja California through Texas - would a 2,000 mile fence make the "border security" advocates happy - and any enterprising person can tunnel under or climb over a fence. So how about guards every 200 ft. for 2,000 miles - that would require 50,000 border guards times 3 (150,000) working in 8-hr. shifts. Would the individual states (California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas) work that into their budgets?
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Border security is not
    difficult. Washington makes if difficult.

World Class Arizona

  • Go Daddy

    World Class People. World Class Company. Go Daddy is a Fortune 100 "Best Companies to Work For."
  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona