Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
lopez_linda_2013.jpg
State Sen. Linda Lopez, D-Tucson, speaks at a news conference at which she and advocates called for limiting the size of ammunition clips and other steps aimed at reducing gun violence. (Cronkite News Service Photo by Chloe Brooks)

PHOENIX -- A Democratic state senator called Thursday for Arizona to ban ammunition clips that hold more than 10 rounds, saying they enable rampages like the ones in Newtown, Conn., Aurora, Colo., and her hometown of Tucson.

"After Sandy Hook, we said that was enough," Linda Lopez said. "Those 20 children who were killed there, that was the minority compared to the number of children who die every year because of gun violence."

At a news conference, Lopez said she also will propose legislation to require background checks for all gun sales and to repeal a state law requiring law enforcement to sell confiscated guns to licensed dealers.

"This problem is multifaceted, but we do have to start somewhere," she said.

Lopez said she was working on the bills, which have yet to be introduced, with the nonprofit Arizonans for Gun Safety.

That group's founder, Geraldine Hills, urged lawmakers to look beyond issues of gun rights and gun control to better protect citizens.

"This is not and should not be a partisan issue," Hills said.

Lopez's proposal comes two years after Jared Lee Loughner used a 30-round clip to shoot U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and 18 others, six of whom died, at a Tucson-area Safeway supermarket. Loughner, who was later diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, was sentenced to life in prison after pleading guilty in an agreement with prosecutors.

"We can't just blame the mentally ill for this," Lopez said.

Besides restricting the size of ammunition clips, Lopez said Arizona needs to require universal background checks for all gun purchasers. That would expand the requirement to include purchases at gun shows and from unlicensed parties.

Rep. Chad Campbell, D-Phoenix, the House minority leader, also proposed universal background checks Wednesday when he announced plans for bills to address gun violence.

Lopez also wants to repeal a 2012 law requiring law enforcement agencies to sell or auction weapons used in crimes to licensed gun dealers within one year of seizure.

A call to Mike Phillipsen, a spokesman for the Senate Republican majority, seeking comment on Lopez's plan wasn't returned by late Thursday afternoon.

share this story:
facebook

11 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    JBFP wrote...
    Magazine, NOT Clip
    Magazines fit in guns, clips go in your hair or a stack of papers. And limiting their size is simply feel-good legislation that does absolutely nothing. Think about it.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Cosmetic, feel good gibberish continues to
    flow from the Left. This is why those without an ounce of gun knowledge shouldn't have any control over law, common sense eludes them. It matters not on the size of the magazine. It is just as easy to swap out a 9 or 10 round magazine as it is a 13 or 17 round magazine.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Totally Agree
    Before these legislators spout off new legislation at least they could do is use the correct terminology. Secondly read other legislation to see if a bill or bills have already been introduced. Linda Lopez is a day late as a similar bill was already introduced the day before. Talk about a waste of time - bantering over bills that are the same. Limiting the size of the magazine will do no good. Shooters will use 2 instead of one.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Totally Agree - Con't
    Everything that these fools talk about - new laws - most of them are already in place and not enforced. Whose fault is that - the federal government. For every new law, 10 loop holes are found and there is nothing they can do about but enforce the current law. The Rule of Law does work.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    What he said. JBFP, that is.
    Use of the word clip instead of magazine on the range resulted in 25 push ups and other sanctions in my training units. As to the value of this proposed change, it would require the shooter to make more frequent changes of his magazines, so that would be interveners, like 61 year old granny, Patricia Maisch, will have more opportunities to interrupt the killing, as she did by preventing Jared Loughner's final reload.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Giving unarmed grannies, like 61 year old
    Patricia Maisch, the Jared Loughner interruptor, more fighting chances to contribute to the cessation of mass murder is a good thing. Gun nuts and the NRA side with the mass murderers by fighting to ensure their continued access to as much firepower as their deranged minds can conceive of using.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Red Coats
    Micho attacks those who protect the Constitution and enjoy the freedoms it gives. People like Micho are the ones who want to do away with the Constitution, disarm responsible citizens and they will try by any means necessary, even if it means being disingenuous, dishonest, and without integrity. There is no ounce of common sense with arguments/attacks made against guns.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The Second Amendment exists for the citizen
    "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation..." - James Madison
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Not familiar with our founding document
    It’s safe to conclude that certain people found on these posts and sadly others like them are not familiar with our founding document and the principles that it sets forth. That’s disheartening because our forefathers fought and died to secure those rights for us, and we’re in the process of squandering them away. The Bill of Rights was included in the Constitution because the people demanded it.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The Left claims this is about preserving
    life and the thought that innocent children were slaughtered. Sadly the Left has no issue with the millions of babies slaughtered at that hands of people like Planned Parenthood. If babies are lucky to get past that process then the Left will pretent to have interest in them. No this is just about good old fashion gun control and taking them out of the hands of everyday citizen.

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona