Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
arias_feb2013_AP.jpg
Defendant Jodi Arias appears in court for her murder trial at the Maricopa County Superior Court on Monday, Jan. 28, 2013, in Phoenix. Arias is charged with murder in the death of her boyfriend, Travis Alexander, and prosecution is seeking the death penalty.(AP Photo/The Arizona Republic, Charlie Leight)

PHOENIX (AP) - Complaining that Jodi Arias' sensational murder case has become a modern-day "witch trial," her lawyers tried to quit in the middle of the death-penalty phase Monday, then said they will call only one witness: Arias.

When Arias addresses the jury on Tuesday, the big question will be whether she pleads for mercy or repeats what she told a TV reporter minutes after she was convicted: that she would rather be executed than spend the rest of her life in prison.

The courtroom fireworks came as the jury that found Arias guilty of murder in the 2008 shooting and stabbing death of boyfriend Travis Alexander was hearing evidence on whether the former waitress should get the death penalty or a life sentence.

Last week, Alexander's brother and sister tearfully described for the jury how his killing had torn their lives apart. This week, the defense planned to call its own witnesses, including a female friend and an ex-boyfriend of Arias, in hopes of convincing the jury her life is worth saving.

But defense attorney Kirk Nurmi told the court Monday morning that the female witness refused to testify after receiving threats, and he asked the judge to declare a mistrial in the penalty phase. He argued that he could no longer effectively defend Arias without all of the intended witnesses, and that "a partial picture is not good enough for this jury."

Nurmi also renewed arguments that the judge should have sequestered the jury during the nearly five-month trial and that it should never have been broadcast live. The case became a tabloid and cable sensation, with its tales of sex, lies and death.

"The court had a duty to protect Ms. Arias' right to a fair trial and failed to do so time and time again," Nurmi told the judge. "This cannot be a modern-day version of ... a witch trial."

Judge Sherry Stephens denied the mistrial request. Nurmi then asked that he and co-counsel Jennifer Willmott be allowed to withdraw from the case, saying they could not effectively represent Arias.

The judge turned down that request too, to which Nurmi quickly replied, "We will not be calling witnesses in the defense case."

Arias' attorneys also tried without success to quit after she gave the interview in which she said she would prefer death over life in prison.

Arias, 32, initially claimed she knew nothing about the slaying, then blamed masked intruders, then claimed self-defense. Prosecutors argued she killed Alexander in a jealous rage because he wanted to end their relationship and go to Mexico with another woman.

Experts say the sheer brutality of the killing has probably already sealed Arias' fate, so any witnesses presented during the penalty phase would have been pointless.

The victim suffered nearly 30 knife wounds, his throat was slit from ear to ear, and he was shot in the forehead. Arias then dragged him into his shower, where his decomposed body was found days later.

"I think they could put Mother Teresa on there and it's not going to spare her life," said Phoenix defense attorney Mel McDonald, a former judge and federal prosecutor.

San Francisco-area criminal defense lawyer Michael Cardoza said the request to quit the case and the defense decision not to call any witnesses on Arias' behalf could very well be a strategic move- but one that could backfire.

"She could argue ineffective counsel on appeal, but the fact is, it's anything but ineffective because what they're doing is handing her an appeal," Cardoza said. "So it's actually very effective counsel."


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

84 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Right! wrote...
    Has she said anything............
    that makes sense at all? yrreta got it right! Makes a lot of sense to say it was kill or be killed, and then going to commit suicide. She didn't have what it took for suicide, but she sure had what it took to kill! I can't immagine any jury finding a man in this position innocent, just wonder if they are going to buy this garbage!
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Wow, so well rehearsed
    Watch her, you can tell she is so well rehearsed. Everything is so well scripted between her and her attorney. Funny how she can remember explicit details from years ago down to the exact time, detail, he said - she said and then I did this, etc. I wonder how long it took her to learn her script. Hollywood should contact her
  • Abuse
    bluehonda27 wrote...
    id say he was a devout Mormon
    If they are visiting religious sites together in Illinois and Missouri, I think that comes close to devout, at least on the outside. Obviously, he was a streaming pile of trash on the inside. And saying he was a devout Mormon doesn't detract from the story to me; just an interesting bit of info to take it all in.
  • Abuse
    Elvis 2 wrote...
    Is she a LIAR?
    Do you want a date? I knew one just like her or close! Had a couple of very nice looking young ones! Others say, she's so sweet and good looking! OH? Date her and find out how brain dead she is! I got out, Thank God! She recently got out of prison for killing some one!! Curious to see what this nut will get! she's so pretty! Want a date?
  • Abuse
    gmm wrote...
    I just can't see how she's innocent
    How is it self defense. She took pictures of his body on the floor. She shot and stabbed him several times while he was in the shower. Everythnig she's done demonstrates she knew what she was doing. If she knew he was using her for sex, she didn't need to make an effort to see him. I hope she fries because I don't believe her at all. She hasn't conveniced me, but then it's the jury she has to pull the wool over their eyes.
  • Abuse
    azsiouxboy wrote...
    She had sex
    in an uncomfortable place? Like the back of a Volkswagen?
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    OJ walked away. Who knows?
    Maybe she will mentally seduce one of the older male jurors, or a female that doesn't see the problem with cutting off the nut sack of any exploitative male. BTW, graphic details are good things.
  • Abuse
    mellowyellow wrote...
    Who cares
    about this woman and what she did? Also, so tired of hearing how great and wonderful this guy must have been because he was a Mormon? Seriously? How does being a Mormon hold you to a higher standard than any other person out there?
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    Arias, possibly Hispanic,
    maybe they could try playing the race card for some sympathy.

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona