Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

PHOENIX — Federal authorities have asked an appeals court to reject Arizona's bid to overturn a ruling that bars enforcement of a minor section of the state's 2010 immigration law prohibiting the harboring of illegal immigrants.

The U.S. Justice Department told the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a Dec. 27 filing that Arizona's harboring ban is trumped by the federal government's broad immigration powers and that federal law already prohibits people from harboring illegal immigrants within the United States.

"It is the national government that has ultimate authority to regulate the treatment of aliens while on American soil because it is the nation as a whole, and not any single state, that must respond to the international consequences of such treatment," Justice Department lawyers said in a friend-of-the-court brief.

The federal government, which filed a lawsuit in 2010 challenging the law, filed the brief as part of a separate challenge mounted by a coalition of civil rights groups.

The harboring ban was in effect from late July 2010 until U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton blocked its enforcement on Sept. 5 as part of civil rights coalition's challenge. Two weeks before shelving the ban, Bolton said she knew of no arrests that were made under the provision.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed the measure known as SB1070 into law and serves as the statute's chief defender, has asked the appeals court to reverse Bolton's ruling. Her office did not respond to requests for comment this week.

Brewer's lawyers have told the appeals court that the harboring ban was passed to confront crime in Arizona, doesn't conflict with federal policies and that the civil rights coalition hasn't shown it has legal standing to challenge the ban.

The harboring prohibition has been overshadowed by other parts of the law, including a requirement that went into effect on Sept. 18 that officers, while enforcing other laws, question the immigration status of those suspected of being in the country illegally.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the questioning requirement earlier this year but also struck down other sections of the law, such as a requirement that immigrants obtain or carry immigration registration papers. The nation's highest court didn't consider the harboring ban.

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

18 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    Why are they fighting this?
    I understand, and even agree, that when the federal government has been given powers, as outlined in the constitution, that state governments cannot supersede them with laws of their own. Likewise, powers not given to the federal government are reserved for the states, and not to the federal government. However, when a state is trying to enforce laws that already exists, why is our federal government fighting so hard against them trying to stop them? Why not redirect them, and help them, to enforce the laws that already exist?
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Look who
    we're talking about. Our Government just plain SUCKS.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    The Feds
    can't even run their own programs without screwing up. Look at immigration, fast and furious and everything else they have tried.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Although the feds
    Have such laws, they fail to enforce them and States have an obligation to protect their own if the feds won't.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Come
    One...come all. The USA has no real immigration enforcement so you can drop anchors, then be entitled to get free stuff, you can also protest until your demands are granted. TheUSA will be very nice to you.
  • Abuse
    2cents wrote...
    When most people . . .
    . . . figure out that this is advancement on state rights is just one small part of the big plan, it will be too late. It already is, in fact. The United States is truly being united, but not in a Constitutional sort of way. Not too long from now, we will neither recognize or be able to salvage it. It is what we voted for.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Law enforcement should work
    together and they want to, but in this case the President is the obstructionist.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Record deportations and prosecutions
    argue differently.
  • Abuse
    1redcav wrote...
    Again, abo/micho,
    WHERE'S YOUR PROOF?? Give us real numbers & facts, instead of your useless babble! And, DON'T use facts from your sources (?) like The Arizona Repugnant,PMSNBC, and, the Communist News Network (aka CNN).
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    @Record deportations and prosecutions
    LOL. Some people are so gullible.

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona