Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
listen Listen: Tom Horne, Arizona Attorney General
Tom Horne joined the show to discuss his proposal for security in Arizona schools that includes at least one armed employee in a school at any time.

When it comes to protecting Arizona schools, Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne said, while he would prefer armed police officers in every school, the idea is not financially viable and arming faculty is a good second option.

"It's unlikely the legislature is going to be able to afford to pay for a policeman in every school," he told News/Talk 92.3 KTAR's Karie & Chuck on Thursday. "This is the second best proposal."

Horne's proposal would see one volunteer faculty member, likely the principal, at each school trained in handling a firearm and emergency situation response. Once they complete the course, that faculty member would be permitted to keep a firearm in a secure location on school property. Their name would not be released.

"I see my proposal as a golden mean between two extremes," said Horne. "One extreme, as people have proposed, would let any teacher who wants to to bring guns to school. I think that would create more danger than it would solve."

Horne said the other extreme is not doing anything and possibly allowing another incident similar to that in Newtown, Conn. to occur.

Overall, Horne said he has received many messages of support, including some from county sheriffs, but some teachers' unions said they feel multiple guns on campus will create more potential violence. Horne said he shares that fear.

"If you have a lot of guns around the school, kids will get at them," he said. "It could cause a lot of trouble. When teachers confiscate cell phones, sometimes kids can break the locks and get at their cell phones. It wouldn't be safe to have a lot of people bringing guns."

Karie & Chuck,

share this story:
facebook

37 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    No blame found
    for violent video games that portray such violence or movies and TV. Lets ignore the real problems and go after what the Left had always wanted gone...2nd amendment.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    @ Working man
    Naive or ignorant.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Gun nuts and the NRA appear not willing
    to accept the plain fact that having 300,000,000 has not made Americans any safer.
  • Abuse
    Zapotec wrote...
    Because you can see into the future, Micho
    And envision the utopia we would be without firearms? Is Mexico any safer with their firearms ban? I feel much safer in my home than I do in other homes in Mexico. I hear many stories of home invasions, rapes, assaults, in people's homes from armed intruders and they have NO way of defending themselves. And before you give me the old "most of the guns in Mexico come from the US" argument, know that guns from all over the world end up Mexico. It's supply and demand, basic economic principles. And if our border is so secure, then why are so many US guns still finding their way into Mexico?
  • Abuse
    Zapotec wrote...
    The First Amendment
    Has proven to be very dangerous too. Just look at Dr. King and so many others who payed the ultimate price for expressing their beliefs. Maybe we can get rid of it and become safer like China and North Korea.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    here in America
    we have magnets that draw armed lunatics into schools, malls and other venues where guns are banned. So we need more gun laws! We need to reinstitute the assault weapons ban!
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    @Zapotec
    Very well stated. Wonder how they get all those guns from the US into Mexico? It couldn't be our liberal, weak arse stance on border protection, could it?
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Paranoiac gun nuts assume that any discussion
    of gun regulation will lead ultimately to the banning of all their dearly beloved armaments. That belief is what makes them gun nuts. This author, for example, has never once suggested a firearms ban of any sort. Yet the easily spooked gun nuts read ban, ban, ban into every sensible consideration of more effective regulation. In fact, their delusional fear of any hint of losing their manhood enhancing phallic symbols causes them to hug their guns tighter to than their chests than they do their own children. Simple fact: Having 300,000,000 laying about has not made us safer.
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    Micho
    little late to the show here, worked the closing shift last night at Mickey Dee's making tiny tots for the breakfast rush? I think it would be fun if we could just try a gun ban to see what happens. It might well end up as the second noble experiment after the failed attempt at Prohibition, or not. But it's the only way we'll know for sure whether it works or not. Till then, all these posts are just mere speculation on our parts. Statistics can be interpreted to support either argument. That's the great thing about statistics.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    "1. Where there are more guns
    there is more homicide (literature review). Our review of the academic literature found that a broad array of evidence indicates that gun availability is a risk factor for homicide, both in the United States and across high-income countries. Case-control studies, ecological time-series and cross-sectional studies indicate that in homes, cities, states and regions in the US, where there are more guns, both men and women are at higher risk for homicide, particularly firearm homicide."

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona