Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

PHOENIX -- Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne proposed a plan Wednesday to allow one educator in each school to carry a gun after they receive free firearms training from law enforcement.

The proposal comes less than two weeks after a gunman fatally shot 20 first-graders and six educators during a Dec. 14 rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

Horne said the program, which would first need legislative action to amend state law, is aimed at reducing the risk of similar shootings in Arizona.

Under the plan, which Horne said is backed by sheriffs in Pinal, Mohave and Apache counties, each public school could designate a principal or educator to keep the gun in a secure, locked location at the facility. It would limit gun-carriers to one per school and would be a voluntary program.

However, Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu came out with his own, much broader plan on Wednesday aimed at training multiple educators per school to carry guns, noting his proposal and Horne's were ``the difference between putting your toe in a pool or jumping in.''

``And they should not be in a locked box these weapons,'' Babeu said. ``Our schools are not as safe as we think they are, and we need to do something about it.''

Some schools around the state already have an armed law enforcement presence through the so-called school resource officer program, but budget constraints have cut it back.

``The ideal solution would be to have an armed police officer in each school,'' Horne said, echoing calls from the National Rifle Association since the Connecticut shootings.

The next best thing, he said, is to arm an educator, comparing that proposal to allowing pilots to carry guns after the 9/11 terror attacks.

Arizona House Minority Leader Chad Campbell, D-Phoenix, called the plan ``a horrible, horrible idea.''

``Teachers are not cops. Teachers are not military. Their job is to teach our kids, not to be worried about how to defend themselves in a tactical situation.'' Campbell said Wednesday, adding that he will instead push for additional funding to fully restore the school resource officer program.

``That's where we need to focus our money,'' Campbell said. ``The last thing you want is a bunch of people with guns at schools making situations worse.''

Babeu said his plan would focus on arming as many educators as possible on a volunteer basis, even those who work at schools where a law enforcement officer already is present. Horne's plan would limit gun-toting teachers to schools where there is no armed presence.

``If a bunch of teachers brought guns to school, I'm fearful the kids could get access to them,'' Horne said.

Apache County Sheriff Joe Dedman said the issue needs to be studied more before authorities approach the Legislature.

``I'm not ruling out any of the ideas,'' he said.

Trish Carter, a spokeswoman for Mohave County Sheriff Tom Sheahan, said he was ``on board'' with Horne's idea, but noted it was too soon to comment or offer specific details.

Currently, only Utah and Kansas allow people with concealed weapons permits to carry guns in schools. In the wake of the Connecticut shootings, more than 200 teachers in Utah signed up for free concealed-weapons training being offered Thursday by the Utah Shooting Sports Council.

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

65 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    UZI wrote...
    The libs throw more and more condoms
    at high schoolers to prevent pregnancies under the premise "they're just going to do it anyway" why not use that same principle and throw out firearms because "they're just going to (kill/murder/rape) anyway". Why is our right to protection limited to latex?
  • Abuse
    SurpriseMe wrote...
    help dont protect
    what about the mentally disturbed kids and their parents? when are we going to help them. that's right let them suffer as long as they dont shoot us normal people. come on we need to help those who really need the help.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    If, as Steve and other gun nuts assert,
    the Founding Fathers wanted us to be sufficiently armed to resist oppressive government, then we will need shoulder launched Stinger missiles to bring down those black helicopters that they will be using to keep us in line, correct? Not to mention other forms of propelled explosives currently forbidden us. How about tactical nuclear warheads? How do we fight the U.S. government and its armed forces with only handguns and semi-automatic assault style weapons. I think that the paranoiac gun nuts are on to something.
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    Why do we need automatic
    high capacity weapons? Because, even if they are banned, the criminals will still have access to them. You don't take a rock to a knife fight, or a knife to a gun fight. Carry or don't carry, that's our choice to make. I don't carry, but if I decide to for fear that I may need to defend myself, I want the same weapons available to me that the criminals are using. Banning won't fix anything, just look at the history of failed bans, Prohibition, cocaine, marijuana, etc...
  • Abuse
    Stacy1 wrote...
    Armed Educators?
    What happens when the armed person has a breakdown and gets harrassed by some kid or other educator? Will there be a second armed person around to stop him/her from shooting everyone in sight?
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Yrreta makes a good point. Everyone
    should own and carry at all times an assault style weapon with fully loaded, high capacity magazines and backup handguns on hips and ankles. There's no telling when the next psycho killer will go on a rampage at a school, church, movie theater, mall, courthouse, etc. I for one will not feel safe till the gun nut and NRA dream of universal ownership and universal carry is realized. Imagine the sense of security that will come as you see everyone walking down the street or seated next to you at the movies with their .223 Bushmaster at the low ready.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Micho fails to understand
    the 2nd amendment. Instead Micho steps in line with those calling on changing or abolishing the amendment. Hopeless comes to mind.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The anti gun nut mentality
    the simpleminded media and politicians with a larger agenda is to assault the Second Amendment. We are so accustomed to this attack on our freedom that many of us immediately begin to fret about the battle to come over gun rights instead of mourning the loss of the victims of the massacre. But we never have long to wait before a "gun grabbing" senator or even a president begin to capitalize on the tragedy to promote the idea that the 2nd amendment from our Bill of Rights is an outdated concept that needs to be ignored, altered, or abolished outright."
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    abortion the largest child killer
    and you won't find people like Micho trying to stop it.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Paranoiac gun nuts tell us that there
    should be no gun laws since they fail to deter gun crime. Assuming that those gun nuts are true to their principles, they must also believe that their should be no laws against rape, murder, child molestation, robbery or speeding, e.g., since no law has ever prevented those crimes from being Committed. Gun nuts favor lawlessness as a response to lawlessness.

World Class Arizona

  • Go Daddy

    World Class People. World Class Company. Go Daddy is a Fortune 100 "Best Companies to Work For."
  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona